Ha man yall try to change history, Demarco is a better win than anyone on Thurmans, Matthysse or Canelo, who compared him to Floyd you dumb ****? Floyd is an ATG, Broner is fighting in a protected era were most boxers don't fight anyone.
Abril went life and death with Prescott, Vazquez and Mitchell schooled Prescott, Burns beat Mitchell in 4
And there's no point in responding. If I post the Yahoo and ESPN rankings from back then, odds are that this clown will go an another rant about them being biased too. He asked who had DeMarco ranked #1, and I showed him. The fact is that DeMarco was actually ranked fourth when he won the WBC title not first like the goof we're talking about is claiming. The top the three guys in the division, Marquez, Rios and Guerrero, all moved up, so DeMarco became #1 by default. This **** is why don't even post in the General forum anymore. Most of the posters are ****. If they aren't trolling or flat out denying reality, they're race baiting. It's a waste of time.
The IBO seems to have computers that don't make mistakes like that, when you use computers international guys do seem to be more prevalent. So who is number 1 to you, I don't believe you said.
Boo ****in hoo, **** off then, sitting there getting pally pally with a guy who can't string a sentence together you can't argue cus you know im ****ing right, go ahead and post the ESPN rankings if you want when I said "according to who" I didnt want politicised rankings, I wanted peoples honest opinion, when the **** did you or anybody else ever consider Antonio ****ing Demarco to be the dominant lightweight in the world?
You know I made a thread asking about Canelo or Matthysse's best win and got nada, I looked at the names of Matthysse opponents and seriously I recognized 4 and one of those guys had 8 losses.
I'm actually high on Abril and Vazquez but let's even say Vazquez was 1 he was Zanfer so a fight with Broner isn't even possible, he fought the number 1 guy available that's a fact, I have said Broner should fight Abril, that's a legit point saying he should fight basically a TR guy isn't
Damn somebodys getting a little pissy. Relax ***** im just pointing out that a bunch of randoms on facebook talkin trash doesnt mean ****. Nobody around here legitimately predicted DeMarco to win. Broner beat one of the weakest champions a lw in years. Thurman, Matthysse and Canelo havnt done **** either. But theyre stepping up now. Broner isnt. Hes fighting Paulie whos his same size at a heavier weight who is the weakest champion at ww since....ever?
See, you dismissed everything I said, yet you want Broner to fight Abril Prescott beat Abril years ago, Abril beat Rios, but Rios went life and death with Alvarado, Alvarado got ***** slapped for 5 rounds by Prescott and came back to win a late TKO, yes, he did the job, but am I seriously supposed to be impressed with Alvarado and Rios swinging at eachother like two drunks, looking at the formline? Alvarado may have been unbeaten, but I've seen him lose, let's just put it like that WTF will fighting Malignaggi prove?
Demarco was a good win to be fair, but it's a complete myth that Broner just walked in and beat up the best lightweight in the world, **** off with that Burns is still out there, Vazquez is still out there, and contrary to what some may believe, those fights can still be made, and made pretty soon
Broner=23 Matthysse=30 I've never claimed Broners opponents were amazing but Demarco and Ponce aren't far behind a 33 year old Judah and a Alexander who looked like he was going to end up being Corey Spinks. But I hear more talk about the 23 year old than the 30 year old and that's no valid.
It proves nothing. Its just the easier way to get Broner more exposure, another belt and a way to be able to pick and choose who he wants to fight after everyone at 140 destroys one another.