I,m not asking which one is the best to have, which one should count more? I say I have to respect the one with the skills over the guy with the chin, because the guy worked hard for those skills unlike the other guy that all he has to do is walk you down and maul you just because he was born with a granite chin.
Skills. Having a good chin and average skills means you take more punishment during fights but are still likely to get outboxed. Skills win fights and if you are a good evasive boxer that can make up for your bad chin.
Skills obviously. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about. It's a technical sport, therefore the fighters with the best technical skills should be the best. Not a **** fighter like Margocheato with E- level skills but a good chin and stone hands.
Depends on the actual individuals in question. A man with a weak chin, no matter how good the skills is gonna **** up at 1 point in his career, likely in 1 of his biggest fights... so that sucks. A man with average skills & a great chin is never gonna be anything more than a 12 rd workout when facing the A+ fighters... so that sucks too. You honestly need both to a certain degree to become a great IMO.
In fairness to Hearns the only 2 fights he lost in his Prime were because his Chin failed him. I heard Manny Steward say that once and I agree.
definately better to be born with a chin because skills can come with time but once a glass jaw always a glass jaw
i dont kno y ppl keep mentionin hearns. there was NOTHING wrong with tommys chin. jesus if sum1 gets dropped or stopped its an automatic glass jaw to some of u guys.