Chisora Reveals Three-Fight Contract With Klitschkos - Says He Was Told Not To

Yes, yes he does.

Because he is a nobody I hadn't heard of him until he scored a fight with Wlad. At first I thought highly of him, for actually showing the courage to get in the ring.

Every single thing I have learned about him or heard from him since then has lowered my opinion. In interviews he is painfully stupid. When reading about the things he says it is clear he is a whiney little ***** with a disproportionate sense of entitlement.

Add to that - he is a total ****wit. Biting someone's ear? Yeah, boxing needs more guys like that around.

I don't know what Wlad's reasons are for allowing Derek "Dick Cheese" Chisora into the ring with him. But they aren't good enough. Yes, it will be great to see Dick Cheese get his stupid, ugly face smashed in. But he doesn't deserve the honour.

 

Does Chisora believe this?

Unlikely.

Oh, by the way Rushman, Im done raping your wife now.

Ive left a little flannel on her face so you can give her a wipe up.

 

it is okay to head butt, rabbit punch, clinch&hitting & all the dirty tactics when it is their own Boxer doing it.

They have their own special rules in the Ring:good

 

I like VK, respect Wlad, but thats stinks to be honest.

 

Funny how Klitschko fans like Farmy complained about DK holding the belts hostage now the K's are doing it!

 

Ok so the whole thing is about them fighting Vitali after Wlad, because we all agree the rematch clause is a standard procedure.

I agree that this is an extra demand from the Klitschkos. But lets loos realisticly at it. First from the opponent's point of view.

Financially it is a good move, since a fight with Vitali (especially after beating Wladimir twice) would bring them lots of money, more than any other fight.

Next, in terms of accomplishments. Another great move as they get a chance to unify the belts and beating a guy who ruled the HW division for years, they automatically become #1.

Now from the fan's point of view. We would all demand him to fight Vitali if he beat Wladimir to prove that he is the best.

All in all, it is only logical that he fights Vitali next if he beats Wlad. Now because Klitschkos are good businessmen and very serious about what they do, they just want to make sure that these steps are taken and prevent someone from running away with the title like David Haye is doing now.

 

That's exactly the point though. That is not the fair thing to do!

 

This is all just academic. Chisora's a domestic level fighter who I never saw making it to world level and he's going to get soundly beaten.

 

I am sure that if Wlad were to get beaten by whatever means, and then Wlad didn't want to fight Chisora again in a rematch, Chisora would be crying *Why won't he fight me again, so I can PROVE the first win was not a fluke?*........

And if Vitali didn' want to fight him after that, he'd be crying over that, too. *I now want his brother! But he seems to be afraid of me! I want to show I can beat both of them so as to leave all doubt as to WHO is the best heavyweight in the world!*

 

We all agree that a simple rematch clause is perfectly in order. It's a common thing in boxing these days, and in this case it makes sense, since Chisora is getting a free 'undeserving' shot at the titles.

Now: If, against all odds, Derek Chisora should beat Wlad twice - first take the titles away from Wlad and then defend them against Wlad in his next fight - nobody could claim that he would be running away with the titles. No, he would fully deserve them, because beating Wlad twice would be a big accomplishment, and he would rightfully be the champ then. Not the undisputed champ, but still THE champ, just as Wlad is now.
Do you agree with that?

If you don't, then Wlad can not be called 'the champ' either, because we all know that he will never face his brother either.

Some people here have to understand that the belts do not belong to the Klitschkos. Sure, the Klitschkos are dominant, but they're only holding the belts, they don't possess them - just as every HW champ before them only held the belt/belts. They only hold the belts until a challenger beats them and takes them away - that challenger will then be the rightful beltholder, not some bandit who dared to steal the belts from the mighty Klitschkos. This doesn't seem to happen in the near future, but these are still the fundamental rules in boxing. If the Klitschkos would possess the belts, they wouldn't have to defend them, right?

Therefore, if someone rightfully takes the belts away from either brother, he deserves the belts - it's not like he stole the belts and therefore has to face the other brother right away. If he wants to unify the belts, then that's fine, but he shouldn't get forced to under K2s premises.

And leave that coward Haye out of the discussion here, as he doesn't fit into this discussion.

 

Yep, Klitchkos are some of the most stingy and prudent mofos in boxing and everyone knows it. They have a brand to protect, so its in their best interest to obligate their opponents contractually, in the event of an upset. Because a nobody like Chisora has absolutely zero leverage in these negotiations he has to accept whatever terms Wlad dictates, no matter how unfavourable or else he loses his out of the blue, totally undeserved shot at a title. Its good for the Klits, its good for the fans in this case (although in other cases we've already seen that this Klit stinginess drives potential top opponents, who do have more leverage away) but its terrible for Chisora.

 

You are such a stupid ****. You think they made Chisora, a man who poses absolutely no risk, agree to 2 rematches but they will let Haye off with no rematches?!?!?!? You're a degenerate piece of **** fanboy who needs to go **** himself fast.

Overall this should be no surprise. Nothing Haye has said about dealing with K2 has been disproven on here or anywhere else. The more info that comes out the more it seems that Haye is telling the truth and Wlad and Vitali are a couple of completely dishonest and money grubbing bitches. The Klits and their bitching out has cost all of us the unification bouts we want to see. Either deal with it or disprove it with sources and evidence you dumb **** Klit fanatics.

 

The guy gets a chance to fight two top guys, unifying the titles, making more money than ever, and on top of that getting exposure to sports fans......who the hell is this chisora guy again?

 

Hey moron Haye even said that it is a 50/50 split with no option offer to him. But he won't agree to it cause he wants all the uk ppv money to himself in which it's basically 60 percent. <<That's the only thing Haye vs either Klits so far ain't happening.

 

Yeah, if Chisora isn't so happy about the contract why did he sign it then? He accepted the terms, the fight is a go, so why do all these British gentlemen on the thread keep moaning?