Chisora Reveals Three-Fight Contract With Klitschkos - Says He Was Told Not To

Yet he signed to fight.

 

You can word it that he *has* to fight Wlad again, then Vitali, but it should be worded he *gets to* fight Wlad again, then face Vitali. That would mean he gets to prove, without question, that he's the best heavy in the world, and clean TOTAL house in three fights...............what is not to like about that?

I see it as not so much an unfair *demand* but rather a golden opportunity that any confident heavyweight would love to get the chance to do..........

That is like saying a good looking woman *forced* you to f*ck her. Force or not, it was something you WANTED to do that BENEFITTED you...............

End of thread.

 

This has to be the worst analogy of all time.

Chisora isn't making love to anybody, he's most likely going to get ****ed up something awful. The point is, if Chisora manages to beat Wladimir Klitschko, the best Heavyweight on the planet, he should then be in the position to take fights on his own terms. He earned that right. I think to be obligated to have two more fights against the brothers is ridiculous.

 

Im dying over here.

 

I think it creates a wonderful opportunity for him, but I'm not sure it's ideal. If that's how they do business with everyone it's horrible. I could see if they felt he COULD beat Wlad, defend against Wlad then beat Vitali. They know damn well he won't.

 

He did not earn this fight. This fight came to him as HUGE opportunity out of NOWHERE!

 

Read carefully - you misinterpreted.

 

In a word...No.

 

exactly why wouldn't you want a rematch and than fight with Vitali. If he were to win this would be a huge upset and rematch would would fill two soccer stadiums and one of them would be full of Brits. Secretly every other boxing fan wants Klitchko beat so money would not be an issue. Even if there is something in the contract that would prevent christola from cashing in big time it's still a great deal. If you are so good and can beat them both than its not a slave contract , it sounds more like an undisputed champion in a year package.

 

Not a surprise. These Klits are awful with contracts. All these common opponents aren't just creating fairy tales.

 

It really does seem like a good deal, at least to the boxing public. I mean, say Chisora does beat Wlad, he's proving he's the best HW not named Klit in a long time. Then, wouldn't we want him to fight the best, and he would have to, with mandatory fights against Wlad and Vitali, the two best guys for him to fight. So, in essence, this contracts creates the best fights at HW for the public. Granted, that is a big IF, if Chisora is the man to beat Wlad.

 

No Champion worth anything isn't going to put his titles on the line without a rematch clause for a voluntary defense. Wlad has learned from the past. I'd be surprised if Haye didn't have a rematch clause against Harrison should he lose. It's just the smart thing to do. And how often do you see someone win a title, then immediately "take fights on his own terms"? Haye had to fight Ruiz....Vitali was forced to fight JC Gomez, and so on.

If Chisora is really the best and he can beat Wlad once, then he should have no problem beating him again in a rematch.....then he gets to further unify against Vitali a short time later, who will be nearly a year older by then.

It's a win situation, unless Chisora already knows he beat them. And no once forced him to sign did they? He could've easily declined, and still have made this public statement, if it's even true.

Briggs/Peter/Sosnowski/Arreola/Chagaev didn't mention/***** about any 3 fight deal did they?

 

After the Sanders fiasco, the Klitschkos are not taking any chances, and now you got to fight both. I'm surprised it's not a 4 fight deal. Immediate rematch if you beat Vitali too.atsch

 

the guy is 14-0 and he is talking about getting crap money.
wtf does he want? tyson money? be thankful you get a crack