Chisora Reveals Three-Fight Contract With Klitschkos - Says He Was Told Not To

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by doylexxx, Oct 22, 2010.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,429
    Jan 6, 2007
    Every challenger signs a contract. Doesn't mean anyone owns them.

    If you want to be top dog, calling the shots, you have to start from lower down.

    According to Warren, the purse split would be 50-50 for rematches with the Klitschkos in the Chisara fight. Hard to see how they would offer Haye any less.


    In this case, like what ? the Klitschkos are the biggest $$$ HWs for the forseeable future.

    Three, four, five (and more) fight contracts are the norm rather than the exception with most promoters. You know this.

    Ever heard of Sauerland, Don King, Bob Arum ?



    Like I said, most prospects would leap at such 'enslavement.'
     
  2. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Regardless of which brother is fighting the other is always right there in the staredown before the opening bell - same principal. It's a massive task fighting just one but the thought of having to rematch and then fight VITLAY is even more onerous. I odn't agree with that format, but it is wha it is.
     
  3. exumspate

    exumspate Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,471
    207
    May 6, 2010
    The 50/50 rematch clause is actually another Klit advantage as Klit would then be the challenger making as much as the Champ...This has me curious since the Klits are fight promoters too, which I assume is separate from the each fighters purse, I would be interested to see what sort of 'promotional' money the Klits received on top of 50/50...

    I've liked the Klits but this is bull****...This completely changes my opinion on Haye...And the Klits...
     
  4. bambamz

    bambamz Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    0
    Jun 30, 2010
    wooooooooow :lol:
     
  5. irishdjc33

    irishdjc33 Active Member Full Member

    506
    0
    Feb 15, 2008
    :deal Great analogy!!!!
     
  6. Theo

    Theo Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jan 17, 2005
    Hayes excuse is your talking **** - no such deal was ever offered. David has said the same thing everytime, he will fight ether of them, but will not do it with the silly options they keep putting in the contract.

    anyone who knows **** about boxing knows the K's have been doing this for some time (its one of the benefits of being your own promoter k2), Monté Barret said the same thing about the klitchkos, his options were also crazy.
     
  7. clyde

    clyde Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,118
    1
    Jul 19, 2009
    Predictably, some of the more blinkered Klit fans are ignoring the issue.......why a guy like Chisora is offered **** money and a cowardly 3-fight contract........and trying to turn the argument into a Haye-t fest.
     
  8. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Derek Chisora is a nobody being plucked from obscurity to fight THE heavyweight champion, he did not earn this shot but was given it because all the half decent challengers are runing scared. If he has a problem with the rematches he should **** off back to the York Hall where he belongs to fight the Sam Sextons of the world, if he's ok with it, which he seems to be since he signed the contract, he should stfu.
     
  9. clyde

    clyde Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,118
    1
    Jul 19, 2009

    Why should he stfu?


    So that we don't get to learn about the Klit Bros. cowardly contracts?


    ;)
     
  10. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    vitali should not be a part of a wlad deal because they are brothers
     
  11. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010

    There's nothing cowardly about it, it's good business sense, something most Haye fans should appreciate. He should stfu because he's lucky to even be in the position to fight one of the brothers, nevermind both.
     
  12. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    vitali should not be a part of a wlad deal because they are brothers

    the klits know this

    thats why they tell him to stfu bout it
     
  13. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    0
    Feb 6, 2007
    Klitschkos are wankers
     
  14. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010

    Says who? If Chisora wants a straight shot a Wlad's title with no strings attached he can work his way into the mandatory position.
     
  15. clyde

    clyde Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,118
    1
    Jul 19, 2009

    Just because it's 'good business sense', doesn't mean it's not a cowardly contract. If you look at the facts, it is.

    Why was he not supposed to talk about it?


    The Klits have been pulling this stuff for years.