Chisora Reveals Three-Fight Contract With Klitschkos - Says He Was Told Not To

And why aren't they entitled to that? As Chisora is fighting Wlad, Wlad would get a rematch. That's fine, but where does Vitali pop in? He has absolutely nothing to do with it.

If Chisora beats both and they both want yet another shot at him, would it be fair if he said "We can do that, but if you beat me, you have to face my dad. If you beat him, fight his brother. If you beat my uncle, fight his son. If you beat his son, beat his sons mate, cause he's pretty hard. Beat his sons mate and then there's his dad. Beat his dad and somewhere in Zimbabwe, he has a really tough uncle who'll kick your arse".

It's a ****ing joke.

 

What are you tryin' to ask here, boy ?

It appears you've been drinkin' lad.

More than usual.

Log off and have a sleep.

You'll feel better and be more coherent in the morning.

 

So it's Warren using something to have a go at Haye again? I believe that for sure...

 

When you are at the top it is common sense to make wise decision with rematch clauses as anything can happen such as headbiutt injury etc.


this sounds like a case of .....


if you manage to knock me out

im going to call my brother to the playgroundf


he is going to try and **** you up

but if you manage to get past him i will come and **** you up again and you cant leave the play ground or fight anyone else until you do that

 

You already came up with the answer yourself Jack.


Because they can and it's still a great deal for Chisara, any way you look at it.

Never heard of the lad till a month ago.

This time next year, he could be unified champion.

 

What is a great deal, is Chisora getting a shot at the title and then a guaranteed rematch. The purse for that isn't set, but it respects both fighters. After that, they are free to go their own way.

The thing which really bothers me, is the third fight with Vitali. It really is like they are a unit but they should be treated completely separate. Someone said earlier it's because they're under the same promotional banner, but if any other company tried that, people would call bull****. The only reason they can get away with it, is because they are brothers - But that's completely wrong. They should be treated as individuals.

 

Exactly.

 

Post of the year. :good

 

It is great how opportunities like this come along. It shows who is worthwhile as a poster, and who is a worthless human being who would probably benefit society if they just blew their own ****ing head off.

Thankyou for demonstrating so succinctly that you fit into the second category, and welcome to my ignore list. :good

Here's the good news though: while people put up with ****tards and whinging ***** fighters like Chisora, they will keep getting them.
Then of course, they will moan about the state that boxing is in - not realising that they themselves are the cause.

All you have to do is stop being suck a ********, and maybe, just maybe, you can stop killing boxing.

 

I notice that you didn't answer the question.

 

'


Good input. Very insightful, as was your pervious statement on them using their size to their advantage, but it could also be a hinderance, had they not used it so well. .

 

Remember. The Klit brothers have a disadvantage. They cannot unify because of each other.

By rights, either brother should be unified champion. They would probably love to be unified. History will not be kind to them for not unifying. But they can't. It's a *****.
So what can they do? Well, they can make sure that if someone wins the belts from their brother - the belts that by all accounts they themselves would probably have owned - then they get a crack at it.

The obstacle to unification is gone, and they will be damned if they will let the chance slip past them.

People are going on about Chisora's rights to enjoy the belts if he wins them. What about the rights that the Klit brothers have had to those belts, but have had to forgo for years?

 

when the klits have sex whos on top?

This content is protected

 

This deal is crooked, I'm a fan of the Klitschko brothers, but Vital has nothing to do with this. A straight up rematch clause is standard, but this is taking the ****.

 

:-(


Defending the indefensible.