Chisora vs Pala/Kovalev vs Silakh/Stevenson vs Bellew Fight Night Discussion

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Mandanda, Nov 30, 2013.


  1. A|C|S

    A|C|S The original |A|C|S| Full Member

    6,223
    5
    Oct 17, 2013
    Won £125 tonight YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
     
  2. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    Sad way to lose a world title fight, before the fight we heard "we have a excellent game plan", well that just didn't even come close to working.

    I assumed it would be keeping it tight, make Stevenson miss and then dragging Stevenson into a brawl in the second half of the fight but like said above he had to work Stevenson more than that...
     
  3. Terminator_X

    Terminator_X Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,796
    3
    Apr 5, 2013
    It's a 50-50 fight, i'd just lean towards Stevenson.
     
  4. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    He did some damage to Stevenson, You got to wonder what more could of been done if he went on the front foot sooner.

    Stevenson's trainer even said the stuff you're doing isn't working change it up.

    Disappointed by the gameplan. A few rounds understandable but not the whole fight..

    Adonis is bottling Kovalev? :rofl.
     
  5. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    If Tony Bellew and coach thought for one minute they didn't have to clobber Stevenson at some point early on then they all need a crash course in boxing strategy. He got it all wrong!

    His fighting spirit? Where was it, why the **** didn't he throw power shots of his own, ok granted the idea is to box the guy and not exchange, but you have to whack a puncher occasionally to let him know your there.

    Bellew, take a break, go away and move to Cruiser weight, credit to Adonis Stevenson.
     
  6. A|C|S

    A|C|S The original |A|C|S| Full Member

    6,223
    5
    Oct 17, 2013
    Kovalev destroys Stevenson, too solid
     
  7. wayne189

    wayne189 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,215
    859
    Jul 8, 2013
    kovalav will beat him inside 6 rounds i believe
     
  8. Vyborg1917

    Vyborg1917 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,788
    2
    Feb 16, 2012
    Froch's prospects taking a sudden turn for the better.
     
  9. kerrminator

    kerrminator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,552
    169
    Sep 14, 2007
    Could he have sounded more scared of Kovalev if he tried? lol
     
  10. boxzone

    boxzone Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Jan 16, 2013
    Adonis Stevenson is talking Carl Froch or Bernard Hopkins. I think that both of them get destroyed by Stevenson. Way to agile for Froch especially after what happened on Saturday night. Froch will be finished comfortably. Hopkins won't live with the power in my opinion.

    He would be destroyed by Kovalev and that's maybe why he does not want the fight.
     
  11. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    Stevenson calling out Froch, Howard Foster pack your bags you're off to Canada LOL

    Stevenson did not sound to keen to fight Kovalev
     
  12. wayne189

    wayne189 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,215
    859
    Jul 8, 2013
    does he want to move down to smw????????????
     
  13. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    I thought Stevenson looked vunerable at times there.

    Kovalev would destroy him in my opinion.

    If the froch stevenson fight happened I would not be writing Froch off.
     
  14. Terminator_X

    Terminator_X Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,796
    3
    Apr 5, 2013
    Stevenson has fought and knocked out much better opposition this year.
     
  15. boxzone

    boxzone Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Jan 16, 2013
    You can see why he would the move down to Super middle there is bigger fights for him with Froch, Ward, Kessler and now you got up and comers coming through you can see why the move down would make sense.