Chopping History!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by thistle1, Jun 15, 2012.


  1. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    I was just thinking, big boxing fan that I am, I'm still not 100% clear on the "order" of Titles (Belts), which is THE One Belt, and which follow after that...

    I know basically, WBA, WBC, IBF and it waters down after that.

    BUT that aside, EXCLUDING All the ****, which Champion's DON'T really have a Belt; and/or NEVER would/could NOT have won the Real one?

    it surely must exclude dozens of them.
     
  2. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Librado Andrade , (must have been) IBF supermiddleweight champion of d world . lost it in d rematch . should have gotten more title shots based on it but instead proved himself as a high risk low reward due 2d lack of paper credentials .

    David Tiberi , IBF middleweight champion of d world . Just as big n achievement as Roy Jones' at 168 3 yrs later .
     
  3. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    the problem is that there is no main belt these days. even the ring magazine belt is now meaningless because of rule changes and being owned by golden boy. being a great fighter is about who you beat and when you beat them. the titles, for fans at least, are pointless now. it wouldn't matter if pac or mayweather had a belt. you know you're watching the best when they're in the ring.
     
  4. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    No I mean what alphabet champions would NEVER have been ligitimate world champions... Never Been.
     
  5. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Most of d "legitimate" weren't d best in their respective classes so what does it matter . color line / avoiding of d best / whatever .
    WSJ and his middleweight predecessors avoided Charley Burley and Lloyd Marshall whom both would have become d middleweights champions of d world at least 4 a short while but weren't given d opportunity .
    Marshall did decision LaMotta , but it wasn't 4 d title .
    Pernell Whitaker could not take d championship like it should from any1 but Juan Nazario whom is of course just 1 example of what u meant .
     
  6. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    frankenfrank, I know this better, or just as much as other serious fans, I know...

    what I'm saying, OK now we can include da Champs too.

    which Mickey Mouse boys WOULD NEVER have been A Real Champion, because of their Real Top Contender (or in the case of A Real Champion), were simply just better; would never have been.

    i.e Kelly Pavlik.

    maybe start with one division at a time, OK the HW's.
     
  7. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Kelly Pavlik would have become a champion most probably .
    Who in his own era would have beaten him ? suppose it's Abraham , what happens in a rematch ? U underrate Kelly Pavlik .
    It doesn't take as much as u think 2 become "d champion" , 2 wrong out of 3 scorecards may be enough , weak division may be enough , partisan referee may be enough , greater contender being sidelined due 2 a decision (b it either right or wrong) may be enough , etc .