Chris Arreola In The 1950's?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 27, 2016.


Page 5 of 5
  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,999
    28,011
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that arguing that Areola would dominate in another era based on size falls into the “size is the only thing that matters” category!

    We used to value things like results in the real world, and technical ability once!
     
    janitor, Jul 30, 2016
    janitor, Jul 30, 2016
    #61
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    ahh but if he lost 50lbs THEN he'd never beat anyone in the 50s!!


    swings n roundabouts
     
    HerolGee, Jul 30, 2016
    HerolGee, Jul 30, 2016
    #62
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    in the 50s, arreola is man u buy kebab from, if hes lucky.

    in kliturd era hes a top contender.
     
    HerolGee, Aug 5, 2016
    HerolGee, Aug 5, 2016
    #63
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,238
    53,721
    Feb 11, 2005
    He beats Rex Layne. Thats for damn sure.
     
    Seamus, Aug 5, 2016
    Seamus, Aug 5, 2016
    #64
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    chris would be best of the brests
     
    HerolGee, Aug 5, 2016
    HerolGee, Aug 5, 2016
    #65
Page 5 of 5