Arreola already soft him up. So is not going to be the same buddy :good And Dimitrenko couldn't even KO Koval, Zumbrun, Buttebean, Francis , Feliz , etc. :-(
I might have gone with Tony Thompson, or possibly Eddie Chambers, but Arreola is hardly the worst candidate for a Top 10 rating.
I would certainly rate the winner of Tony Thompson vs Luan Krasniqi into the top 10. So that ranking should not last long. I would rate either higher anyway as they are easily more proven fighters.I just was not imprssed , Arreola is really slow and limited.
What a joke. WHY??? This guy's record has a bigger selection of tomato cans than most supermarkets. Has Arreola actually beaten anyone in the top 50? Or anywhere close to it for that matter?
But he keeps winning by KO. :good He's very aggresive and with a lot heart. And like some poster said, he reminds me of a Juan Diaz HW, but with much better power
I guess Ring is not much better than wbc, ibf or wba for that matter. Who did he beat to be even in the top 20, Malcolm Tann???. Even Chambers deserves to be ranked higher than Arreola, and I am not even talking about Povetkin.
Povetkin and Ruiz, and even Thompson should all be ranked top ten, long before someone unknown and unproven, ( as of yet ) like Arreola. Arreloa may work himself into a C level Sinan Samil Sam type fighter. Kidding, of course. Who knows. He may turn out to be something, but I wasn't too impressed the one time I saw him fight.
i really like arreolo, but i think this is a bit early, maybe Povetkin deserved a top 10 spot more then areollo
Arreola is a decent prospect but way behind Povetkin and Chambers.IMO Chambers would easily out-point Arreola and Povetkin would KO him in 6 or 7