Chris Eubank- "It isn't for Froch to say how good he is"

funny you should say that seeing as its you who referred to Stiegliz first, not me. i didnt refer to him until I was replying when you mentioned him.

you are once again slapping your own forehead at your own circular reasoning. nice one, failey.

 

another example of your failed reasoning. According to you, Dawson's comprehensive win over old Hopkins is flawed but Calzaghes struggle to win overold Hopkins is a great win. That can only be true ifyou are saying that Calzaghe is a weak champion, making his voctory overold Hopkins a greater acheivement - you belittle your own hero by not thinking through things clearly.

There is no point in arguing with you if you cant see how self-contradictory you are. You'd be ready to try to proof black is white if Calzaghe was involved.

 

**** off eubanks you used to blow your own horn plenty, hes clearly worried the public rate him higher than himself.

 

froch has done more than eubank. eubank seems jealous all these younger guys are getting all the glory.

 

eubank did more over a long period.

froch has has more quality opponents.

as with calzaghe, its quality v quantity.

 

Why do I care what Eubank has to say at this point exactly?

 

Eubanks beat fighters u mention that not many knows who they are.

 

Froch has done far more than "never gone out of brittain" eubank.**** that idiot.

 

Calzaghe beat a fresh hungrier and better kessler than the one who beat froch, how did joe avoid the new smw generation then when he beat kessler to unify the titles :huh Calzaghe didnt avoid froch, its a bit like what RJJ said about Joe all those years ago, why should he fight someone who he considered not a big name at the time, calzaghe felt the same way about froch.

 

This :deal

 

Chris eubank would ko Carl

 

This has always been an issue with Froch, and why many, espeically in England do not like him. Froch had an amazing win, but everybody knows he is not on Eubanks, Benn, and especially Calzaghe's level.

 

Yeah,Eubank was up his own arse alright.The Brighton braggart,fair play to him for it but he never lived up to his own boasts in the ring.It may of been right that after the Watson accident,he stepped off the peddle a little when fighting.Either that or he just didn`t want to face the very best which he didn`t.So he should leave off his comments on Froch.

 

So in 2 posts you have not been able to answer me about who Calzaghe moved to LHW to avoid and ducked the questions again. I mentioned Steiglitz because he before being beaten was a mandatory, but then lost out when beaten. If you knew what you were trying to debate against, you would know that. Proven again that you didnt. You are far too easy to school.
As for Calzaghe/Hopkins, Dawson/Hopkins, you are so daft, you miss the fact that Calzaghe was coming up in weight for the first time of his career whilst Dawson has been a LHW and champ at the weight and that, that version of Hopkins was older than the version you claimed wasnt prime when Calzaghe had him wanting time out, yet now rate it for Dawson. You fail to note Calzaghe was past his prime and at the end of his career. You also fail to note there was 18 years between Hopkins and Dawson rather than 7 between Calzaghe and Hopkins :hi:
Now you can once again try and answer the previous question

 

So Eubank fought the undefeated relinquished IBF SMW champ and fought the WBC SMW champ and had the best SMW resume in his era, with Benn arguably having the second best resume of his era. So who didnt Eubank fight? Toney and Jones didnt do a smuch as longer established SMW champs Benn and Eubank

Eubank fought the undefeated former IBF SMW champ away in Germany and I think where he fought Collins in Ireland was Aire rather than Britain, though not 100% sure about that

How has Froch done more? Has Froch beaten anyone as good as N Benn or anyone as good as 2 weight champ Rocchigiani?
Watch Auracle duck this and come out with something pointless

Eubank was a 2 weight world champ who went undefeated in well over 40 fights.
Out of Eubanks 18 WBO SMW title fights 14 of those fights were against fighters who were, had been or became top 10 SMWs. One was a unification and another was against the undefeated former IBF SMW champ (relinquished his title). In fact 6 of the fighters he faced had been or became world champs.
Thats more than Froch. Eubank beat Watson, Benn, Rocchigiani, Malinga, Wharton, Holmes to name a few.
Eubank was WBO SMW champ, beat undefeated the IBF SMW champ who also became a LHW champ and drew with Benn the WBC SMW champ who was a 2 weight champ also.

Cant see how you think Froch has done more

Sure someone will explain