Chris Eubank v Dennis Andries

I think a good version of Eubank can pull off a decision here. And Dennis Andries was a former super middle himself so the size thing shouldn’t be much of an issue

 

Eubank UD

 

He became more refined, but I think the difference was less him using a jab but more having better sparring at Kronk. The fact was he was not a bad fighter and he was very good. He beat Czyz and Harding and Williamson and Sibson and was strong and a great fight would have been the two guys Hearns beat in 1987 Andries and Roldan. That matchup. I pick Andries whom to me proved more and was higher caliber, which might make others say no. since Roldan did lose to great and very good fighters in Hagler, Hearns and Nunn. who was the very good. The first two were obviously greats.