Chris Eubank vs Sumbu Kalambay

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Cobra33, Aug 15, 2009.


  1. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Okay I'm probably wrong theres no need to start coming out with that load of bollocks you ****ing sad ****. (Yeah I went there)
     
  2. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    this match up would up a disputed trilogy who comes out on top after the first two fights ending in a points win for either man i am not sure :think
     
  3. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Just another great fight from that era we'll always be deprived of.
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Kalambay is by far the better technical boxer with superior movement and skill. Eubank made many mistakes and he'd be punnished for those. I'd expect him to outbox Eubank who would have some success with his jab and fast hands but largely he'd get outboxed.

    Eubank is so strong though and never gave up, very underrated power and carried it late. Expect him to pick the pace up in the championship rounds going for the KO finnish. Kalambay probably holds on for the UD but a late Eubank KO would not suprise me 1 bit
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,364
    9,999
    Jun 23, 2008
    Its not bollocks. Eubank wanted no part of the top American fighters. He had no problem fighting Benn, and Watson, but those two werent considered the WORLD'S elite. The elite middles of that time were Nunn, Kalambay, McCallum, and Toney... and later Jones. Eubank never showed any interest in fighting any of them. In fact he openely admitted he wasnt found of facing Nunn, and McCallum.
     
  6. Rubber Warrior

    Rubber Warrior Resident ESB Soothsayer Full Member

    912
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    A prime Kalambay would be too mobile, too elusive and too slick.
     
  7. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I dont give a **** either way but calling Eubank a ***** is just disgraceful. You should be ashamed.
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,655
    13,056
    Apr 1, 2007
    And your entire opinion being based on the equivalent of foaming at the mouth, fervent flag waving is any less tasteful?

    Nationality strangly somehow makes up peoples minds when it comes to these fights. Not a coincidence considering you're the sole ****ing person giving Eubank a prayer here, and the very first to start tossing personal insults.

    Chill the **** out and think past a fighters nationality and your own next time you start calling people ****s.
     
  9. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Who the **** are you, his mum? I appreciate your unwanted lecture but calling someone a ***** when they wouldnt dare say it to their face just enrages me, I think that would be a personal insult to him wouldnt you say? I said I was probably wrong but you just ignore that. Its got nothing to do with nationality I never mentioned that once and its pretty obvious he started slagging off Eubank just to provoke me, I mean cant you see that? I just gave him what he wanted. I've just seen more Eubank than Kalamby and made a rash choice, I usually try not to be biased over anything. And I'm not taking it back hes still a **** as I'm concerned.
     
  10. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,900
    13,281
    Feb 2, 2006
    Calling Eubank a ***** isn't right.The man proved his heart in the Benn and Watson bouts.At middle I not so sure Toney beats Eubank.
     
  11. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    It isn't. You can never count out a man, who was able to come up with a punch like the one he came up with in the 11th round of the second Watson fight when he was all but beaten, in any fight.

    Kalambay however was a highly skilled operator who is poison to a lot of fighters stylistically. Provided he doesn't get caught, he should be able to do to Eubank what he was able to do to many other very good fighters, outsmart him and outpoint him.
     
  12. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    A lot slicker.


    Kalambay had every punch in the book as a counter puncher, the roll with the right hand and shoot the counter uppercut, he was a class fighter and he would of outboxed Eubank.

    Eubank never faced anyone as technically good as McCallum, Kalambay or James Toney, they were on the level above him.

    Eubank's attacking Boxing was terrible he used to lunge in with punches without getting his feet into postition and leave himself open and off blanance to counters, Eubank was good when he could dictate the pace of the fight and when the opponent came to him Wharton, Benn.

    This is what im talking about with Eubank, he reached with punches quite a lot.

    4.25

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zdtD52zNao
     
  13. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009

    :lol::lol:

    He reached with punches because he did not get his feet into position before throwing them.
     
  14. riggers

    riggers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,218
    3
    Aug 14, 2008
    chris Eubank was poor going forward, he was at his best when he countered opponents. Dan Sherry made him look silly. kalambay would win massively on points. Chris might do better against other fighters, he may even be better overall, but styles make fights and this is an example of that. Kalambay
     
  15. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,900
    13,281
    Feb 2, 2006
    All of you assume Eubank would be the aggressor vs Kalambay-I think he wouldn't.