Chris John vs Juan Manuel Marquez-FULL FIGHT AND POST YOUR SCORECARD!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fedor Em, Feb 27, 2009.


  1. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Let's see it your scorecard and back it up! This was a questionable decision at best.

    [yt]7kCbjQGghNw&feature=related[/yt]

    [yt]6AZnOFMiZLM&feature=related[/yt]

    [yt]90GymornC9I&feature=related[/yt]

    [yt]mkB-fjWtN_s&feature=related[/yt]

    [yt]rM6tT9pqpNY&feature=related[/yt]

    Round 1 JMM 10-9 Chris John did nothing to take this round from the champion. It was close but JMM.

    Round 2 JMM Clearly 10-9

    Round 3 John Close but clear 10-9

    Round 4 John 10-9 I watched this round twice and couldn't pick a winner. Neither one did ****. I am gonna give it to John though to give him 2 of the 4 rounds that could have gone either way.

    Round 5 JMM Clearly 10-9

    Round 6 JMM Very Close 10-9

    Round 7 John Very close 10-9

    Round 8 JMM Clearly 10-9

    Round 9 JMM All Dinamita again 10-9

    Round 10 Even 9-9 Some bull**** calls on the low blows in both 10 and 11 John's trunks were extremely high. Marquez was hitting him near the belly button but you have to take a point away. Still JMM dominated that round.

    Round 11 Even 9-9 Same situation as last round. Point taken from JMM for dodgy low blow calls. JMM won the first 2 minutes convincingly. John came on pretty strong the last 30 seconds but it wasn't enough to take the round.

    Round 12 JMM Close but clear

    116-112 Juan Manuel Marquez

    Even if you gave rounds 1 and 7 to John which is ALL the razor close ones this fight would be a draw.

    The rounds John won though he didn't win big. The rounds JMM won he won clearly and the 2 even rounds he would have won big if it wasn't for the low blow penalities.

    Robbery Exposed. Dinamita one of the best. :good
     
  2. bizzer07

    bizzer07 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Dec 11, 2007
    nice analysis, thats what happens when you step into some corrupt mofo country unfortunatley. he would win a rematch hands down
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Haven't seen it but will later

    BUT most on here had Chris John winning as did most ringsiders, calling it a robbery is bull****
     
  4. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    3,4,6,7,11 for john...round 11 was the decider..i give it to john

    i had it a draw 113-113
     
  5. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    How could you give 11 to John? He got the better of about 2 exchanges the whole round. The rest of the time Marquez was backing him up.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,841
    45,560
    Mar 21, 2007
    115-113 Marquez. I can see the argument to the contrary, and I don't consider it an out and out robbery.
     
  7. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Most on here have not seen the fight.

    *edit* With that crowd there, and commentating in this video there was definately an bias leaning towards John.
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    it's close but i feel john did more damage that round..JMM's moment there was when he landed several body shots...it's closest round imo
     
  9. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    It's not Whitaker/Chavez but this fight in the states with a compatent ref and fair Judges Marquez would have won and WIDE. Those were bad point deductions. JMM won the last 5 rounds and 7 rounds overall convincingly. You could make an arguement he won 9 or 10 rounds.
     
  10. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    Nah, It was a close fight..could gone either way, but definitely not robbery...And besides, Marquez has no lose in his record, it was all robbery..wasn't it?
     
  11. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Really? I thought 1, 4, 6, and 7 were closer. The first half of this fight was a nightmare to score. The 2nd half? All JMM :yep
     
  12. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    It could have been a draw if you gave John the benefit of the doubt, are from Pacland, and scored every single close round for John. So yes it is a robbery.

    With scores like that. The fix was in before the fight started.

    I don't like your tone noob. You must be a Margarito fans alias with that join date. I actually thought JMM lost the first Pacquiao fight by a point and won the 2nd fight by the same margin. Don't get it twisted. I score fights like I see it and with as little bias as possible. Both fighters in the ring deserve their fair shot at winning. JMM was just the better fighter in this video on this particular night.
     
  13. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    i really hard time scoring this one...i've always have a policy that close rounds go to the favored boxer...but in this case, john has the hometown advantage. can't really blame the judges for scoring it to john...

    when i score the fight, i try to be in the shoes of the judges.

    i know ring generalship is considered, but i put more weight on punches landed...kind of amateur judging...1 point for power punches and .33 or .5 depending on how clear the punches are...

    if the difference is 2 points or less...i give the round to the favored boxer or a hometown guy...It's just fair as an underdog of fighter on the road, you must win convingcingly to get the round..that's the general notion...but in terms of ring generalship, JMM takes 10 or 11 rounds..
     
  14. rumour24tiger

    rumour24tiger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,718
    2
    Jan 27, 2006
    7-4-1 Marquez. Minus the 2 point deductions, I have Marquez by one round. John boxed well in spurts but couldn't quite keep JMM off.

    Good performance by John, and it has established what hopefully will be a top level career. But that was substandard Marquez; JMM had probably never seen him fight before, didn't have great preparation etc.
     
  15. Championship

    Championship Lineal Full Member

    894
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    I had it 116-113 to Marquez.

    Marquez John
    10 9
    10 9
    9 10
    9 10
    10 9
    10 9
    10 10
    10 9
    10 9
    9 9
    9 10
    10 9

    Round 7 - I couldn't really split them so 10-10, although John could've shaded it.
    Round 10 - Marquez deducted for low blow. It was around the bottom of the belt area so just about legit. After the deduction he hit another low so a deserved point off all-in-all, but I thought he clearly won it so 9-9.
    Round 11 - Marquez deducted again, he was winning the round but John came back quite strong so I think it would've been a 10-10, but the point off made it 10-9 John.

    I thought Marquez deserved the win and dominated some and clearly won most of the rounds and it seems like the only reason John got the nod was because of the hometown bias in the point-deduction rounds which were probably given as 10-8s to John and round 7 was probably given to John also, so I could see a way in which this result could come about, in a country that is less regulated and unused to big fights and with the national boxing hero who made it a competitve fight.

    It was a close fight and John never looked out of his depth but I think Marquez worked his way to deserve a good win throughout the rounds, but in the debatable rounds where he kept working his advantage, there was a way to take the round off him and the fight as the home judges would be looking for any small opportunity to give it to John so I can see how the result came about. Not a massive robbery but Marquez should have the W or at least a D.