CLASSIC FIGHT NIGHT THREAD:Wilder-Fury II

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Nov 15, 2014.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,839
    44,550
    Apr 27, 2005
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Inside it can be an advantage. But like I keep saying, and you won’t listen, the fighter has to be good enough to get into that position whereby at that distance he can have an advantage.

    But play along with this nonsense about me thinking shorter reach is always an advantage. Which is an utter misrepresentation of what I have said. Ever.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, but is it an ADVANTAGE for a fighter to have a 79" reach or an 85" reach, all things being equal?

    If you were designing a fighter for you to manage, would you chose a 62" reach or a 65" reach, if those were the two choices that were available?

    If you were choosing which fighter to manage and all things were equal aside from their reaches, one longer than the other, which would you chose?

    Is it BETTER to have a long reach or a short reach?
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Exactly. If the guy with the long arms is forced to use the wrong tactics he will not be using his long arms as an advantage. As Sam Langford used to say “whatever your opponent wants to do, don’t let him” and that works both ways. If a short guy wants to get inside don’t let him. If the long guy wants to stay away, don’t let him. cut the ring down, draw him in, let him fight the wrong fight.
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Having long arms and knowing how to use them can be a massive massive advantage. I have never said it cannot be. Ever. Nowhere have I ever said long arms is always a disadvantage.

    And yes. I would prefer my boxers to all have the longest arms and teach them how to use them.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2018
  7. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    385
    Oct 1, 2013
    Usyk will dethrone these SHW stiffs. His reach is also two inches longer than Parker since that is so topical.
     
    choklab likes this.
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's great.

    So you would describe Sonny Liston's 13-16" reach advantage over Sonny Liston a significant advantage, one that is difficult for the smaller man to overcome (though always allowing that he might)?
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Sonny having a 14 inch reach advantage over himself, what are you talking about?
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    You know OVER HIMSELF.
     
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I presume you meant Sonny Liston having longer arms than Marciano? Yes, Sonny had longer arms than Marciano.

    Would Sonny use his longer arms as an advantage against Marciano?

    I personally think Sonny might just fall into the trap of thinking he could blast Rocky to smithereens and get too close - so in my opinion - I don’t think Sonny would necessarily use his reach to the fullest advantage. No. And to be honest punching down to maintain distance against a crouching fighter is more difficult to do against than with an upright fighter. Sonny most likely fancies going straight in anyway. Those that think that will work for him fine. That’s up to them.

    Sonny marched right into Floyd and beat him up in close, but Rocky was different to Floyd. Unless Sonny takes Rocky out with the very first punch he’s going to get hit back a lot. That’s my take. And I am entitled to it.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    No.

    No no, IS a reach advantage of 13-16# an advantage.

    That's all.

    Not "could it be overcome".

    Just, is it an advantage?
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    It’s called a reach advantage because the arms are longer. Like I say it is what you do with them that counts.. If a guy wears longer pants does he have a leg advantage or just longer legs? Same with necks or feet. @mcvey loves calf advantages. He has used that before in a debate about something before. Maybe he knows more about it?

    But in 99% cases yes. Long arms is a great advantage.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is true of every advantage. Speed advantage, depends upon what you do with it, power advanatge,depends upon what you do with it, strength advantage, depends upon what you do with it.

    Every conceivable advantage that ever has existed in any walk of life that has ever been uncovered, or ever will be uncovered, it is true of that advantage that "what you do with it is what counts" with absolutely no exceptions in all of human history.

    Your answer is so useless as to be equivalent with "they need oxygen"; it is that useless as an answer.

    What I'm asking you is simple.

    Is a 15" reach advantage an advantage for a fighter or not?

    Just say "yes it is".

    You'll feel better.
     
    mcvey, Mendoza and Seamus like this.
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    I disagree, Povetkin TKO's Wilder.

    While Price isn't great, Povetkin fought him at his best. Price put up a spirited effort in front of his home fans. The result was a KO of the year candidate for Povetkin.

    But how can Povetkin fight a guy 6'6" to 6'8". I'll tell you how. Povektin has a good duck under and moves his feet forward while setting up a balanced punch to the body or the head. The body shot can double up to a hook to the head or left-right to the body. Povetkin also has the same move duck under lead move that features a hard right hook that lands on the face or head. Sometimes he throws a hard lead right hook, which is uncommon. No one in the division features a punch like this. It's the punch that stunned Price before the left took finished him off. Povetkin has some head movement, a good guard vs. hooks, and a high work rate. A long jab can get to him, but unlike say Parker, Povektin won't go off his best path to victory. Whoever fights him better be able to take body shots. If he lands that hook to the head, he's getting a knockdown or knock out.

    Povetkin, even at age 38 still has a solid chin, decent speed, and most importantly the will to win and understanding and technique how to fight a taller or bigger man; I think Povetkin would TKO Wilder, and is 50/50 vs. Joshua.

    And judging by neither man wanting anything to with Povektin in his mid 30's, I think we know why.
     
    The Long Count likes this.