CLASSIC FIGHT NIGHT THREAD:Wilder-Fury II

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Nov 15, 2014.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    if that is the scientific finding. Yes. I accept the theory behind that. In practice smaller gloves produce a more effective punch. Cleaner ratio trumps overall impact.

    the information about impact strictly speaking was not tested on soggy horse hair stuffed gloves with loose wedding massaged away from the taped up knuckles like in Joe Louis days but rather on MMA mitts. No matter, MMA gloves are still smaller and therefore more accurate and potent overall in a combat situation than safety competition boxing gloves.


    Twice the impact, twice the effect? It's splitting hairs when we both know small gloves do make a big difference.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    Good.

    The main thing should be that this holds; that in a year's time you aren't regressing to making the same claims.

    No; the punch is NOT more affective upon landing (to any extent further than the proven research which is small). You could say, i think, that it is harder to use the small glove for ear-muff defence, and that because of this, it is easier in this regard to land a punch. There is likely an increased return, too, in parrying.

    So you can say big gloves are better defensively and that's all you can say. But this works both ways. It has harder for the smaller fighter to get hit.

    This is an advantage you are consistent in ignoring.



    They don't have "Twice the affect". What are you talking about. What does this mean?
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    We have both established that it is harder to land a clean shot for both fighters with big gloves. You have endorsed this. Even you.

    This favours the bigger guy. Clearly.

    I am not ignoring the defence of the smaller guy. Sure he benefits from shielding himself but a stronger guy hitting him on the gloves whilst he's got his ear muff going on still shakes him up.

    Twice the affect because the ratio of cleaner punches with smaller gloves is more effective than it is with larger gloves. Even if the impact might be the same. Smaller targets can be pinpointed more often. More accurately. More shots on direct target. I have explained this.

    Small gloves make a huge difference. It's obvious and I've explained it.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: what do you mean "even me"? On the rare occasions where your observations coalesce with reality i'll agree.

    Disagree.

    You are saying fighters with smaller gloves land twice as many punches as those with bigger gloves??

    It is interesting though. On this forum have you have been on and on about how smaller gloves lead to harder punches. Now you have been forced to retract that. I wonder, really, if you seriously believe and can defend the position that punches with 6-8oz gloves are twice as likely to land punches as those who wear 10oz-12oz gloves.

    That four ounces can make a fighter twice as affective.
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    You disagree that lack of previous precision does not make it harder for smaller fighters? Or because lack of precision effects both fighters you somehow think it fair that just one guy can still make a greater impression without so much precision?

    If you half the precision you half the chances of the guy who depends on more precision.

    At one time it was work rate versus size and power when both had precision. Halfing precise punches landed for the guy with only initial work rate going for him clearly makes it harder for him. Halfing precision for the guy with size and power won't stop him making an impression with clubbing blows. He had that going for him already.

    no, I'm saying fighters with small gloves obviously land a greater number of clean shots. Huge difference.


    A clean punch effectively is a more damaging punch. Saying "harder" because it is so much more affective is not so incorrect as you would like it to be. I shall try to remember to use " more damaging" punch rather than "harder" punch just to keep you happy.:good since smaller gloves do make a big difference.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,535
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    To be totally honest Haye had no issues landing on Valuev and Byrd had no issues landing on Vitali.

    The only thing which favours the bigger man is the allowance of clinching. Fury started wearing Cunningham down when he could lean all over him. Wlad beat Povetkin by being able to lean all over him. Even Ali and Frazier.

    Punish clinching hardly, force a man to fight inside once his range is given up and you would see the smaller man win much more.

    Just picture Haye and Wlad trading in the pocket, every time Wlad clinches he gets a point taken off. If Haye can slip that jab Wlad's only option is to block, run or trade. How effective would the bigger man really be then?

    Put Dempsey and Wlad in a phone booth and only a fool would pick Wlad.

    Atm a man works his way inside just to be rewarded with a clinch, one he can't prevent because he's against a man 40 pounds heavier. If it was such that a man works his way inside to be rewarded with an in fighting battle, it would be down to skill not size who came out on top.
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    You make excelent points. Compared with earlier eras It's clear that the changes in the division have left smaller fighters with far too much stacked against them.


    Landing is one thing. but if the ratio of landed punches is made up of more effective cleaner punches (as it used to be when gloves were smaller) then within the punches they did land a higher number of more damaging blows would be recorded by Haye and Byrd.

    yes the bigger man has too many things his own way. Your right, this is unfair. Nothing is handicapping the larger fellow. At least at one time the bigger man was working for less of the round as he paced himself for the longer distance, but even that is eliminated in favour of Jumbo.



    Not very because wlad is not going to beat Haye to the draw. However, to be fair to Wlad he was good at using distance and bluffing a less experienced guy into working at his pace. But your right clinching is not acceptable to that kind of extent.

    I honestly think Wlad will do a lot better in today's gloves. Dempsey won't get the same quality in so many shots, he will need more rounds to do it. He might till do it but he's got more stacked against him than he ever did versus a giant. Give Dempsey the gloves he had versus Firpo and its almost an unfair advantage to Jack. This is much fairer.

    it's going to stay like that. That's why the division has went the way it has. Now it's jumbo sized goons against each other. skill is almost irrelevant compared to past times. Because they allow for their size. Long arms and a weight advantage is almost the be all and end all. This is why they need separating. Make heavyweight Superheavyweight and if nobody wants to be in it they can cut weight and become heavyweights again. What's wrong with being 6'9" and 224lb? If they want to be heavier the punishment is to join Superheavyweight. Fans win if this happens.

    Penalise holding. For every 14lb heavier a guy is than his opponent that should represent a 10% forfeit to his opponent in purse money. Either that or the smaller guy gets to wear smaller gloves than the big guy. 6oz versus 12oz.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,535
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    TBH you sound deranged with this glove talk mate. That isn't the issue.

    The issue isn't even fight length, boxers can condition themselves accordingly and fight at a pace of their choosing.

    The issue for me is that if you get a fighter like Wlad, who has moderate hands peed, concussive power and a friendly ref, it's almost impossible to beat him spotting him 20+ pounds. If he was made to fight inside or actually control range outside without the use of a clinch, he's suddenly a lot more beatable and has to reply on stopping a man on his way in.

    This doesn't benefit the bigger man per se, it benefits a certain style of fighting, namely those who cannot fight inside. Ali did the same to Frazier.

    If clinching was punished the gloves wouldn't be an issue because, apart from Bowe and maybe Lewis and maybe Vitali, no SHW has shown any inside game. They don't learn to fight inside. They learn to jab and grab. Take that away and it opens up to more pleasing fights.

    If Willard was allowed to wrestle Jack every time he came within punching difference, history would be totally different.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I made this point briefly earlier and I agree completely. If we want to make changes that will encourage action and reward skills, something needs to be done about all the holding and leaning (in the heavyweight division, at the very least, but I'm not sure that I see any reason to stop there). Would be far more direct and effective than coming up with a pseudo-heavyweight division.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Great post.
     
  11. Boxing125

    Boxing125 Active Member Full Member

    503
    21
    Jul 5, 2015
    Ali used to clinch Frazier

    He did it all the time in Ali-Fraizer 11

    Would a ref such as Mills Lane make a difference in the modern HW division?
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think we have explored the subject of glove sizes pretty extensively.Being only of average intelligence I didn't get the connection with the Wlad v Fury result.
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Fury can fight on the inside.
    In fact he would have done a more punishing job in the later rounds if Wlad hadn't been allowed to grab, hold and/or turn his back to get away from an in-fight.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    If there's a rematch in the UK ,I don't think Tony Weeks will be getting the call as third man.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    I disagree with your claim that smaller gloves definitively favour the smaller fighter. I think, at best, that is totally unproven.


    So what is your claim that smaller gloves are "Twice as affective" based upon.


    It's either harder or it's not, and we have seen that it is not. I'm surprised to find you are not incorrect even though you are proven so completely incorrect, but I suppose I shouldn't be.

    I think everyone would be happier if you didn't spend post after post for years making an inaccurate claim (small gloves foster more powerful punches).

    "More damaging" (by which I presume you mean more likely to cut?) is completely different to "harder" which is a claim you have repeatedly and erroneously made on this forum.

    And to echo lufcrazy, I, too, find your posting on this matter to be unhinged.