CLASSIC FIGHT NIGHT THREAD:Wilder-Fury II

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Nov 15, 2014.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well all know what you wanted to imply though mate.

    I don't shout from the rooftops every time I call an upset tbh, they are never appreciated at the time of the upset anyways. I said on this thread I wanted Fury to do it, I didn't expect him to be the quicker man nor to have that stamina though.

    You have held this opinion about weight for a long time now. You think SHW wouldn't survive in the 50's because the deck was stacked against them.

    Your one track mind reminds me of Mag and his hatred for Duran.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,123
    Jun 2, 2006
    I was hoping Fury would win but expected Wlad to.
     
  3. Alexandrow Vids

    Alexandrow Vids Active Member Full Member

    505
    241
    Oct 28, 2014
    Wlad said: "I could not reach him"

    What kind of argument is that?

    I do not want know what happened to better jabbers like Liston or Lewis with much harder Jab than Fury
    and also 84inch Reach. Fury has 85inch.
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes he does! I shook his hand and it was Like shaking hands with a bunch if bananas! :good
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    All I have implied is that I think the time has come for the 238 pounders fight only among themselves. Cruiserweight deserves to be a mainstream division. Give Heavyweight name back to heavyweight sized boxers.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    I am a bit surprised many don't get why Wlad lost. As a Wlad fan, I think I know why. It's a combination of issues.

    1 ) He's near 40 years old. The speed and stamina appeared to be diminished. How did Louis look vs Marciano? How did Holmes look vs Tyson?

    2 ) He became complacent. Wlad has not lost a decision in 20 years ) Amateur and pro ), and was on an 11 year run as champion. It is possible Wlad underestimated Fury a bit.

    3 ) Wlad always was cautious with rangy out fighters who could punch ( Haye ) or guys who could counter ( Ibragimov ). Fury has a very long reach and moved around a lot. Klitschko was too cautious and lacked his form and speed, which in the past were almost never counted. Fury did not counter him much, and I do not understand why Wlad would not throw more jabs, which would have set up the rest of his offense. Fury did enough to stay active, and really is just an average boxer. Wlad inexplicably withdrew from the fight!

    4 ) Wlad either did not trust or did not received the best conference and advice from his corner. I think its a bit of both.

    Conclusion: If Wlad still has fire left, he can make adjustments, throw many more punches, and knock Fury out even if he's just 75% of what he was a year ago.
     
  7. Boxing125

    Boxing125 Active Member Full Member

    503
    21
    Jul 5, 2015
    So what if he is nearly 40 years old - in the HW division nowdays that should be an advantage with his experience. Louis hadnt been champion for 4 years and could only throw with one hand and Holmes had about 4 weeks of training after being retired for 18 months.

    Wlad was an active champion, no rust or lay-offs, and nobody predicted a win on account of Wlad's age before the fight. Its easy to grasp for an excuse now. I hope Wlad does change his tactics in the re-match so we get a more exciting fight.
     
  8. Boxing125

    Boxing125 Active Member Full Member

    503
    21
    Jul 5, 2015
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,115
    Mar 21, 2007
    How?? You have no data on it - and apparently you are treating my data as suspect. What form will this debate take? Yours, where you state what suits you and then refuse to admit that you might be wrong without my doing an awful lot of work while I admit, yes, that could be possible but we don't know?

    I couldn't think of anything worse, frankly.

    What do you mean MIGHT be an opinion? It's the very definition of opinion! It's nothing, worthless. It's literally meaningless and trying to stack it up against science - your claim, by the way, that i put a "redaculous" amount of faith in science as opposed to making wishes was my favourite moment from this exchange, you do always supply a beauty - by continuing to say, "ah, yes, the knockouts look overly effective!" and denouncing the technique at hand is literally spastic. Who got knocked out? What punishment had they absorbed? What is the general reputation of their punch resistance? etc etc etc. Still, i have to give you props for leaving it only a couple of pages before you start repeating your debunked theories, usually it's six months at least :lol:

    I bring up circumference as an issue, now, immediately, it's circumference that gives the supposed advantage. But why are you talking about MMA gloves? I thoguht MMA gloves were not suitable for comparison? Have you ever thought about actually finding stuff out instead of passing off your wooly opinions as some sort of fact?

    Now you have to find -

    1 - A specific definition for a clean shot that is reasonable.

    2 - Some way of measuring what the difference is between connection rates with smaller gloves and bigger gloves in fighters that are reasonably accepted as generally comparable

    3 - Do that a lot more.

    Then you might have something worthwhile.

    But you won't, and until you do, insisting, endlessly, that small heavyweights are "handicapped" by bigger gloves is pure speculation and not speculation you have done very well in representing or exploring.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,123
    Jun 2, 2006
    If they rematch I'll have a good bet the result is the same but more emphatic,possibly a stoppage win for Fury. I thought Wlad looked average against Jennings and for me he has always been a bit overated.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,149
    25,353
    Jan 3, 2007
    Probably true. For Wlad to win a rematch he'll have to use tenacity, show real grit and take chances. He was never very good at that even in his prime and had everything going his way.. He's already discovered that his traditional plan of holding and pot shot hitting doesn't work.. Now place him in a situation where he has the psychological component of knowing he's already been beaten by said opponent and his chances of doing these things are further diminished. If they fight a second time, it'll most likely be in London before a very loud and hostile crowd in support of Fury and after Wlad has past his 40th birthday. The odds are against him and on so many levels...
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    They will rematch. This tells me Wlad is embarrassed and the motivation is back.

    Wlad is already a betting favorite. This time, he'll knock Fury out.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,115
    Mar 21, 2007
    I hope Fury can see him off. If he doesn't, Wlad will just retire and the division will splinter. Who knows when a new lineage might appear?
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,149
    25,353
    Jan 3, 2007
    It's not out of the question.. But he's going to have to do something different this time and part of that will involve taking chances and overcoming adversity - Two things that he hasn't done in a very long time and perhaps only a couple times in his entire career at that...
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    As long as Fury prepares as seriously for the rematch as he did for this fight he should win, more easily, probably by late stoppage.
    Fury, well-prepared as defending champion, a young fighter 27 years old and constantly improving, can be expected to be significantly better in the rematch.
    Wlad will probably be better as well, but not enough to off-set Fury's advantages.
    I rate Wlad highly enough to not write him off completely though, he's a great fighter in my opinion.