By the way not to sure i said this earlier, but holyfield is going for valuev to win, he reckons haye will underestimate val and its to early to take on such a giant, but of course most boxers get it wrong, so take that any way you like
yep still in my teens and thanks ive been reading some newspapers and one 'preview' was just a bunch of Haye quotes and the other was just saying how big each guy was and what they been eating :-( yep but my Dad will go halfs with me
Valuev is somewhat erratic. He looked great against Beck, mediocre against Barret, great against Lyakhovic, pretty good during the Ruiz rematch (nice jab), but mediocre against Bergeron and downright **** against Holyfield. I expect most trainers to have figure this out by now, but Valuev's HUGE weakness is his footspeed. Even a 46 year old Holyfield managed to stay out of trouble for most of the fight because he stayed on the backfoot. This is probably what determines how good Valuev looks. Liakhovic, by nature, isn't on the backfoot much, which made for a great fight with Brewster, but also ensured he got hit very often by that 86", 7 foot jab of Valuev. The tactic of landing a few combinations per round and staying away for the remainder, is almost failsafe and was executed well by Chagaev, Donald and Holyfield (but only Chagaev got the decision, he was also most convincing but the others should've gotten the win nonetheless). If Haye can do that, he can win a rather easy decision. Make that: with the PROVEN exception of Wlad. Vitali might also be the better puncher in the sense that he's more likely to stop his opponent, even if he is not nearly as good with a single punch.
No you never you said a specific round, you never said which round. This is probably a bit late but good luck tonight lad.