Classic Forums Thoughts on Pac-DLH

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Dec 4, 2008.


  1. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,058
    Oct 25, 2006
    The guys that called it right take a bow.

    I suppose the logical matchup is now Pac v Hatton, an intriguing fight if ever there was one. The fight I really want to see is Pac v Mayweather. It has to happen now!

    I wonder how Manny Pac will be viewed 10 years from now?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,262
    49,638
    Apr 27, 2005
    That's a great post.
     
  3. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    I was bewildered when DLH tipped the official scales at 145 lbs, but I still expected him to gain at least to step into the ring as a juniormiddleweight.
    ......then HBO announced DLH is at 147 right before stepping into the ring......at that point, I went from Pacquiao has no chance, to Pac can actually win this thing!

    Has anybody heard a quote from DLH on this weight matter, and what his rationale was for this......dont media credentialed journalist do their jobs anymore?
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    If true, I think it's refreshing to hear that a guy is actually coming into the ring inside the limit and not blown up 10-15 pounds on his weigh-in weight. It's the way it should be.
     
  5. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    I consider DLH a great fighter for many of the reasons you stated.
    Certainly he was competitive even in the fights that did'nt go his way.

    ......but the bottom line for me is that he does'nt belong with the true elites in history.
    Bottom line is that he could'nt rise to the occasion and lost every big fight to a bonafide peer in his career.
     
  6. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005

    What surprised me the most was Oscar's weight at fight night. I don't know what kind of training he has been through to move down so easily but it clearly was a factor during the fight. Hell, Pacquiao came in the ring heavier than Oscar ! Manny at 148.5 and Oscar at the welterwieght limit 147 when everybody was expecting at least an extra 10 pounds for DLH.
    I think it was a bad miscalculation from the so called "star team" whom De La Hoya worked with for this bout.
    But that only a factor. The main reason Oscar lost is due to two things : his age and Pacquiao's speed.

    It would have been different if he was on the same level he used to against PBF but well, in boxing, you just don't know what can happen.
     
  7. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    25
    Mar 28, 2008
    Some random thoughts:

    Obviously half of the fight's result is that Oscar was shot, but the other half... I wonder. All the fights in which I've seen Oscar do his best work was against guys with whom he could control the tempo and range. Even when he had one without the other (ala Whitaker, where he could control the range due to his massive size advantage but not the tempo because of Whitaker's speed and elusiveness) he couldn't dominate guys who were in or near the top tier.

    When he couldn't control these things, whether because a fighter was too fast for him, (Sugar Shane Mosley) could physically impose their will on him, (Bernard Hopkins) or because they had a similar skill set and were able to contest his control of these things (Quartey) Oscar struggled mightily, and with mixed results.

    No matter what stage of his career DLH might have been in when they fought, Pac would never allow Oscar to set the tempo, and the relentless aggression of Pac could always have the potential to upset Oscar's preference for using his reach and keeping things at arm's length.

    This all makes me wonder how much trouble Manny would have given even a better Welterweight version of Oscar. Now, I'd expect the Oscar who beat Quartey to pull things out, because of his physical advantages and because he wouldn't be shot to hell, but it does make me wonder if Pac could have given even the best version of DLH trouble.

    Any thoughts from the forum?
     
  8. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    100
    Nov 8, 2004
    I can't believe DLH weighed less than Pac. He still looked a weight class up on him, clearly imo.

    I don't believe DLH would be stupid enough to come in at 147. I've heard people say that he wanted to weigh a light amount to legitimize the contest, but come on now, this is Oscar we're talking about. He's hardly the type that would do something like that. Just look at all the specs he had for the Mayweather bout.

    I'd sooner believe that he had an adverse effect to the diuretics he probably needed to make 147 than believe that he was weighing in the 140's for 3 weeks before the fight.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,642
    Jun 2, 2006
    Crow, as in "To Eat Crow"?.Christ you Scousers really are thick aren't you,the most intelligent bloke who came from the Pool was probably Yosser .And stop swearing ,or I'll resume saying "resume "again.
     
  10. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004

    Have you ever heard anyone actually say this who isn't called Chuck or Brad?

    And why would you 'eat humble pie' when you simply called a fight wrong? :lol:
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,262
    49,638
    Apr 27, 2005
    Oh come on now :lol:
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,642
    Jun 2, 2006
    My name is Randy ,but my friends call me Tab,and while it might be usual for you ordinary people to make a wrong prediction ,it is highly unusual for the likes of me.
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    I'd venture to say that Pacquiao has the kind of loose, relentless, technically underrated style that would have always caused problems for Oscar's more tense, calculating, and cautious style. These respective styles also happen to reflect their psychologies as well. Pacquiao is not self-conscious -and he's fluid, whereas Oscar is not. Pacquiao's intensity would disturb Oscar and force Oscar to take risks -and pay for them. I don't believe that Oscar would ever be really comfortable with that.

    This was a bad choice of an opponent for Oscar in terms of style though not size -particularly at this point of his career. And particularly because he effectively sacrificed his size advantages. In his desire to match Manny's speed, he sacrificed the most important asset a natural WW would have over a natural FW -physical strength. 145 was just too low.
     
  14. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    105
    Aug 5, 2004
    A pleasure to read something so thoughtfully, precisely, and artfully put, S89. A post with real weight!

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP6AwknmjkU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0_HOWlGD6o
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    De La Hoya wasn't tense and rigid in his younger days. Not when he fought Hernandez, Ruelas, Chavez, etc, over 12 years ago. He was very free-flowing back then, also fluid and loose. His upperbody and head movement against Hernandez was as good as it ever was at any point in his career. He fought out of a low crouch throughout that fight and was very elusive. Constantly 'bobbing and weaving' and swiveling from the waist. And he was anything but 'tight' technically against Chavez in 96. Who was the influence at that point in his career? Jesus Rivero.