Classic James Toney...on Peter-ViTKLiT

this is true. he's funny with a lot of his comments and u can tell he's just clowning at times. but he goes way too far much of the time.

and he's not a top level hw like some claim he is...he could have been a force but he just couldn't/can't get into any type of condition so his workrate and defense have suffered. He can't move his feet anymore and was getting tagged way too easily by a less than precise Sam Peter. Rahman was finished years ago.

 

You are just so ****ing ignorant:

HBO had Toney up 115-112 in the second McCAllum fight. The fans did not boo the decision. Larry Merchant and Lederman had Toney winning.
And yes, Toney consistently landed the hard overhand right and McCallum arm punches with no power. McCallum admitted in the post-fight interview that it was close. After your incompetent allegations, it is safe to say that you have never seen that fight.

I am not even gonna bother talking about Toney-Griffin II, because it is obvious that you never saw it.

 

Suge do you care to comment on this little bit of news................


[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=95013[/url]

 

"learned to much off fighting me" Thats classic

 

You dumb mother****er. How about this...I upload my copy, which doesn't have the usual HBO Toney nuthuggery, just for you :hey? The fans did boo the decision. I have the clip. They even did a close up of a few irate fans. If Lederman & Larry are your sources...

You must be the first person to claim McCallum was landing with no power. He won it clearly.

 

McCallum had nothing on his punches that night. He landed a lot of shots but there was nothing behind it. Meanwhile Toney landed the harder shots which get your attention and he anded enough of them.
The fans did not boo the decison and there was no controversial. The judges scorecard were too wide in favour of Toney, it should have been scored closer but in any case Toney won it.

I do not know what you saw in the second Griffin fight. Griffin got outjabbed and outpunched. Toney had the better jab and landed more powershots.

I watched those fights a dozen times.

 

How refreshing to read all the bull**** from the british pro wankers, and how things really turned out. Klitschko not getting hit by a single Peter punch making him quit, Haye running from BOTH Klitschkos with a shitty excuse of a "strain back" from SHADOWBOXING, to fight an ultra-cautious non-punching marathon running "win" over a standstill of a mountain who would have lost to Donald, Ruiz 2x and Holyfield based on the same scoring style they handed Haye a gift win with, and Haye STILL refusing to fight Vitali who even takes care of that ones mandatories to make him free to fight. Karma is a *****.

 

:deal

 

Seeing how this thread was bumped, you may as well take the opportunity to view the youtube comments on this decision, most of which also disagree with your blindly biased p.o.v. ;

[url]http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=bB4hgdMxTYw&fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DbB4hgdMxTYw[/url]

 

Some disagreed, so what. Toney landed the harder more telling blows. If you like the busier fighters who throws more punches but with no authority, so be it. McCallum never hurt or stunned Toney in 2 fights.

 

:yep:good

 

JT is the Archie Bunker of Boxing.

 

Be fair - Haye vs a Klit is the biggest fight in the heavyweight divison. There is nothing else out there...

 

I agree. But the question is will Haye finally step up and fight a Klitschko. IMO..Im not so sure he will