Classic vs Modern. Aus Forum Only. You decide!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MSTR, Aug 27, 2007.


  1. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Please share because I would be interested to hear either way.
     
  2. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    You really think Sugar Ray would school a prime Jermain Taylor. Jermain is a natural middleweight and very big for this division. I imagine he would weigh in well over 170 on the day of the fight. Robinson certainly wasn't prime at 160. he is a naturally smaller man. He was beaten at 160 numerous times by guys that would appear to be much lessor fighters then Jermain Taylor. Watch the two on film side by side. Not highlight reels but actual fight footage. Tell me who looks bigger and stronger, even faster to a degree. It is a very POPULAR opinion that Ray Robinson is the greatest of all time, but we are looking at actual ability here. Robinson may win, but I highly doubt he schools a guy that elite fighters from our generation could not do.
     
  3. Dekkers

    Dekkers Team Bergeron Full Member

    1,296
    4
    Jul 8, 2005
    Hell yes (in this example), Taylor would crumble beneath Sugar Rays speed, pressure and power, I wouldn't have him schooling a prime Hagler though :yep
     
  4. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Good Post.
     
  5. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Taylor isn't an ATG at 160 and never will be, but neither was Sugar at 160. He was best as a welter weight. Look at the size difference alone. Jermain is a tall, fast strong and big middleweight. Look at some of the guys that Robinson lost 2 at 160. I think its easy to remember them as these invincible fighters, but in reality they just weren't.
     
  6. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I realise there will be some idiots that it will attract. But that happens everytime on ESB. The debate i have going is more so between myself, Amsterdam and CHJ against a lot of the classic forum guys like Sweet Pea, McGrain, Cross Trainer ect. Obviously a lot of other people have been putting in though as well, so it will be interesting to see if we can get a heap of facts and footage together to see collectively what the opinion of the posters here is.
     
  7. Dekkers

    Dekkers Team Bergeron Full Member

    1,296
    4
    Jul 8, 2005
    Look at the trouble he's had with smaller fighters like Kassim Ouma, these guys aren't Robinson, I remember seeing Robinson lose to Bassillo (?? I think it was) and thinking he'd still beat Taylor that night (and Ray was past his best). A fighter like LaMotta would also mow down Taylor with his pressure.

    Taylor has talent but he doesn't put it together (athletic ability isn't enough when other factors are lacking), he's arguably lost to Hopkins (Hops would have beaten him convincingly prime, Hops v Robinson is more interesting), Wright (well above his best weight, slowing) and Spinks (Taylor would've won if he wasn't so tentative).

    If Taylor convincingly deals with Pavlik, i'll take this statement back!
     
  8. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Do you think fighting more often is beneficial though? IMO it would cause more injury and give less time to train. Training gives them the opportunity to practice new skills, refine their techniques and have much more sparring completed. It would have been very difficult for older day fighters to do any where near the amount of sparring that modern fighters do as they would risk injury before their fights. Is it better to spar 50 rounds in a week under the watchful eye of your technical coaches, or to fight 12 with the obvious pressures of a live fight with a crowd.
     
  9. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    To be fair though Roy was KO'd past his prime, just like Ray lost a heap of fights past prime and many other great have as well. Mosley certainly isn't the best from our era either. Watching the film how do you compare the defense of someone like Robinson to Whitaker? What about his counter punching ability to a fighter like Mayweather. It is my belief that as boxing progresses, fighters can learn from all the fighters gone. They can watch all the tapes of old and benefit from eras of great boxers, taking the best skills and using them to bring their game to the next level. When I watch someone like Robinson I can see his natural ability, but technically often times he looks sloppy. I honestly have trouble believeing that he you could take that exact same fighter and put him in with Floyd Mayweather and watch floyd get thoroughly beaten.
     
  10. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Ray lost to a heap of fighters at 160. Obviously he was past his best, but if you are arguing that a 160 version of him SCHOOLS Taylor I would say you are wrong. Maybe he beats him but I definitely don't see him schooling him.
     
  11. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    YES I really think he would school Taylor.

    Taylor's punch output and just they way he fights he wouldnt be able to keep Robinson off him.

    Sugar Ray Robinson has beaten some of the best Middleweights ever and although Taylor won against Hopkins i would hardly say he dominated (I think he lost the first fight)
    Robinson at Middleweight has wins against
    Robert Villemain UD 15
    Carl Olsen KO 12
    Jake LaMotta TKO 13
    Randy Turpin TKO 10
    Carl Olsen UD 15
    Rocky Graziano KO 3
    Carl Olsen KO 2
    Carl Olsen KO 4
    Gene Fullmer KO 5
    Carmen Basilio SD 15
    Now that is some quality wins at 160. and to say he wouldnt handle a bigger more Natural Middleweight like Tayor well Robinson fought Joey Maxim for the Light Heavyweight title in which he was dominating until a lucky punch in the 14th round.

    He would kill a soft non natural killer like Taylor.
     
  12. Kegsy

    Kegsy Lights Out Full Member

    20,268
    1
    Aug 9, 2006
    Great topic of discussion.
    Its very hard to decide as the styles of boxers have changed alot of the years.
    I hate sitting on the fence, but i may this time.
    I think a prime Sugar Ray Robinson would have been WAY better if he was brought up in todays atmosphere.
    Sugar Ray destroys Jermain Taylor sorry to say IMO.

    Some of today's unique styles from unorthodox boxers may have caused havoc IMO with some of the older fighters from back in the day tho.
    I could analyse this for hours & get no where.:lol::lol:
     
  13. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I compare Taylor to perhaps Monzon in their styles. Both guys are very awkward to watch, but seem to get the job done. I highly doubt that he gets schooled. Perhaps losing but not schooled. Regardless, Taylor is hardly the best of our generation or even close to it. If we are comparing the best to the best, what about whitaker or mayweather as opposed to Robinson.
     
  14. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Have you seen any of these guys fight though? Some of them are VERY rough technically. jake la Motta at times looks like a lead footed punching bag. These names look great but you are comparing resume. What I am asking is to look for yourself beyond the widely accepted opinion of most here, and use your own analytical ability to see who has the better skills. Not just look at the names that we know are commonly accepted as being the greatest.
     
  15. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    OH i agree that styles make fights but your talking about a slick Powerful Ray Robinson.

    Were talking about Robinson the way he beat opponents before they even entered the ring. There is no question that technique wise we are more advanced today but i can tell you what we are not today.

    We are not naturally Stronger from years past and as we get older we are more pampered things are given to us on silver platters and you dont have to work as hard to get things.

    Robinson would walk straight through a tame looking Jermain Tayor sorry MSTR but on this subject you are wrong.
    I look at there records and fighters of the Middleweight division back then was probably the best era of Middleweights ever seen. with names like
    Ray Robinson (173-19-6)
    Gene Fullmer (55-6-3)
    Carl Olson (97-16-2)
    Randy Turpin (66-8-1)
    Jake LaMotta (83-19-4)
    Del Flanagan (105-22-2)
    Dave Sands (97-10-1)
    Gustav Scholz (88-2-6)
    Joey Giambra (65-10-2)
    Peter Mueller (134-26-14)

    Thats just to name a few in the 50's and early 60's. I mean look at Taylor Today he is fighting guys like Ouma, Cory Spinks do they even compare to say LaMotta or Olson.

    Please im not stupid. Yes today we are better techniquely but we are weaker naturally. Its common knowledge.