Classic : Where does Joe Louis sit with you.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Balder, Apr 15, 2015.


  1. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Underrate Joe Louis at your own peril deniers, but the Joe Louis circa Max Baer, and before WW2, would and should be considered the most formidable and lethal punching machine that ever lived, and a favorite in odds over any heavyweight during his halcyon days as heavyweight champion. Sure he had a couple of tough moments in some of his bouts. Louis was only human, but
    in his glorious prime his coil spring combinations always got the job done and
    he never had to revert to the "rope-a-dope " to hold off superior punchers as
    Clay/Ali did time and again. The perfect build for a fighter was Joe, 200 pounds of muscle, perfect timing combined with great balance that should make him a favourite H2H over every other heavyweight ever. I will go out on a limb and say that at his best his most dangerous opponents would be
    Jack Dempsey of Toledo and the young Mike Tyson ,both who hit hard and fast and EARLY...Joe would have less trouble with the bigger behemoths as
    he would get their first with the mostess...Of course any top heavyweight of the past has a chance with anyone, but in my minds eye give me the lethal Brown Bomber of the Max Baer fight. And collect your winnings from your bookie...
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,402
    83,261
    Nov 30, 2006
    You simply can't overrate Louis. (or Ali, really, unless you're calling him the p4p and not just HW GOAT)
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,586
    Jul 17, 2009
    An all time great,definitely. I have him in my top 3 all time great heavies.
     
  4. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    To me, the two great questions about resume are:

    1) did the champion fight the best around?

    2) did he treat them the way you would expect a great heavyweight to treat them?


    You can only fight the guys who are there, and it's theoretically possible that the greatest heavy who ever lived, coming in a weak era, might have a thin resume.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,581
    27,240
    Feb 15, 2006
    So you are not a fan of longevity?

    Perhaps you should be.

    A lot more fighters attain dominance over a short period, than achieve longevity.

    Hell, if Joe Louis retired after he won the title, he would have been in the mix for that.

    When you match fighters against the top ten in the division, their failings get ruthlessly exposed, even over a short period.

    Anybody who achieves longevity against the top ten, is truly exceptional.