Classic's take on drug testing situation

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by OBCboxer, Dec 25, 2009.


  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I've seen. I had a sneaking suspicion you've been joking around & being sarcastic, but your persistence has made me think otherwise. Was my initial thoughts correct?
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I'm looking for more of a rise than anything. The whole situation is lame, but I can't say for certain if Pacquiao is on roids or not. I just hope the fight gets made. If not, the blame is on Pacquiao in my book. I'm just taking it overboard in the General Forum.
     
  3. sauhund II

    sauhund II Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    2,203
    Nov 8, 2008
    While I respect your posts in general and see eye to eye most of the time you are way off or have very limited knowledgs about PEO's..................cycling is the KEY here. If you know the date you can EXACTLY time the athlete when he is clean . Fact not fiction. Doping is a MAJOR business who attracts the brighest minds because of the challenge to make it UNDECTECABLE aka be one smarter than any testing agency. Remember , for example, if someone develops a 100 % secure code you can bet your ass that someone as gifted or talented will try to break it.....and they usually do.

    IMO, the fight will be made, too much dough on the line but one thing is for sure if Pac agrees to the random blood tests shows up trim/fit but soft and not overly mascular plus having a hard time coming close to the contracted weight then the answer will be right there for everybody to see.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'll read it, it should be amusing.

    I try not to argue too much in this whole debate on general forum. It's nauseating what people will say to defend their man-crushes.
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I see, yea I'm pretty pissed. Hopefully Paulie makes an example of Pac. :lol:
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Thats the bottom line my friend......it was Sr. who said he "suspected"......can you sue someone for slander for stating a proffesional opinion about a sport that you know something about??????


    ......and as of right now, I have yet to see Mayweather Jr. himself speak that he thinks Pacquiao is doping.

    John Garfield, I understand if you dont want to offer an opinion, but dont you believe that its making Pacquiao look bad by refusing to have a little blood drawn.
    Pacquiao was already under suspicioun before any Mayweather was even in the picture.
    If he's clean, he'd sure save himself alot of trouble and stress by just agreeing to the tests, and then going out and royally putting a beatdown on Mayweather Jr.

    ......if Pacquiao could do that, it would be the ultimate satisfaction for himself and all his Pinoy fans.

    The first reports from the Pacquiao camp were that they did'nt want Pacquiao weakened for the fight by having blood drawn from him so close to the fight date.
    .....but now that Mayweather is willing for the window of no testing within 5 days before the fight, all of a sudden Pacquiao's excuse is as weak as I've ever seen a weak excuse be given out.....Pacquiao is claiming now he wont go closer than that 30 day window because he feels having blood drawn from him past that window will effect him mentally!
    ......all of s sudden physically weakened is being replaced with mentally weakened.:patsch
    .......you really cant get any weaker excuse than that.
    Of course Manny is going to feel weaker, and its going to go way further than mentally if indeed he's been juicing all along.

    There are just some weak arguments coming from the Pacquiao side I'm afraid.