Clenelos record isn't as impressive as fanboys think it is

Haha okay mate good one

 

P4p Canelo naive ass licking rankings
1. Scar
2. Isal
3. Shadow

At least @Shadow can present some arguments even if they are shite, you half wit

 

You do realize that you're comparing Alvarez' tune-up with the tomato can devourer's biggest win to date, which is a tune-up quality fight.

 

You may as well just delete your account youre not 1/1000th of the Canelo fanboy Shadow is and you're just outright stupid

 

Could pick apart anyone's record

Should I do the same with manny or Floyd?

 

Glove slapping and elbow punching lol

This content is protected

 

I’m not a fan of Canelo, I’ve criticised his 155 catchweights on here in the past, but it’s getting boring seeing all these recycled threads moaning about him.

I literally thought this was an old thread because all this exact same stuff has been said before 1000 times…

 

You saying that doesn't mean anything. Reminder - you tried to argue this point RBR as we went through the rematch and you ran away halfway through after you somehow found a way through your GGG fanboy goggles to give your hero both rounds 5 and 6 of the rematch lmao. Round 6 of the rematch, a clear Canelo round, was the 2nd most clear Canelo round of the rematch and was a round that even the most die hard of GGG fans, even those who had him winning the rematch clearly gave that round to Canelo. By scoring that round to GGG, then on top of that you trying to act like I was crazy for scoring that round to Canelo shows a clear and utter disregard for any credibility to your scoring, then on top of that you ran away from going through the rest of the rounds.

So for you to boldly state thata GGG landed the cleaner punches outright in 8 rounds of both fights, it's certifiably hilarious, you are simply pulling that statement out of your arse. You not only failed to prove that, you also failed to even complete your argument for the 2nd half of the rematch. You showed that you are inclined to give rounds to GGG, like round 6, that pretty much no one else did. So you making wild statements that do not hold up have no value. The fact is, even those who argue GGG won, don't make the arugments you are making. They state that GGG won because he outworked Canelo, outjabbed Canelo, etc, not that he actually landed the cleaner punchers which is abundantly unfactual. If your argument is that he landed a couple more jabs on average per round and by virtue of counting punches as they do in the amateurs, not in the pros, if that's your argument, then that's better than lying about it and claiming he landed the cleaner punches which is utter nonsense.

It was plain to see that Canelo landed not only the cleaner punches in the vast majority of rounds but he also landed the vast majority of the harder more effective, more impactful punches which is why judges look for. He landed at a much higher % which shows he was more efficient than GGG which judges also look for when scoring. Canelo's problem the first time that was he gassed in the middle rounds, not that he failed to land the cleaner shots. If your argument is that GGG outworked him by throwing more punches overall and landing a few more jabs, fine, that's one thing. But you go far beyond that, with no support for your arguments. It's clear by now that you can't hang when it comes to debating Canelo vs GGG, and you also don't do yourself any favors by claiming wildly conspiracies like Kovalev took a dive or Canelo fights are fixed. You're so over the top and out of touch with reality it's hysterical.

 

@Quina74 can you once and for all explain how GGG got all those marks and bruises on his face from glove slaps and elbow punches. How dumb do you think people are?

 

Every boxer's resume can be crapped on with BS Hateful bias.


But enough with the petty bull****, Cut to the chase, name a boxer who has a better resume than Canelo right now.

 

LOL yes it does. Because you don't understand clean punching and exaggerate everything Canelo throws. I'm gave up trying to debate you because its simply impossible when you credit everything Canelo throws even if it grazing. As a result, any round you score in a Canelo fight is invalid

As for the rest of your very concise post, it's just the usual delusional ramblings of a hardcore Canelo nutrider/ Canelo bot

 

Canelo is a fantastic boxer, he really is

But anyone saying he ia more skilled than brudda Usyk is a mentalist

 

You know better, you know how accurate of a scorer I am, and that I always back up my scoring with sound logic, and often timestamps and accurate descriptions of landed punches. It's just you for some reason can't take it and think you're smarter than everyone. If you had ANY credibility left that's out the window with your Kovy taking a dive fight fixing nonsense lol. Give it a rest and save yourself from further embarrassment, for your own good.

 

So is every P4P list that all unanimously have Canelo P4P #1 and ahead of Usyk in the rankings mentalists?

In general, don't you think it's odd to have a Heavyweight or even a Cruiserweight high in the P4P rankings? It's not that common historically. I remember a few years back people tried to argue Fury was P4P #1. That was crazy talk, heavyweights in general don't belong up that high in P4P lists unless we're talking like mid-1960s Ali, Prime Larry Holmes or Prime Tyson or something. Fury getting knocked down twice and nearly out by Wilder in their first fight made people realize how silly that was to have him that high and he eventually dropped.

I'm sorry but Usyk beating AJ by lackluster decison is not that impressive. AJ got KO'd by Andy Ruiz for goodness sake. Usyk has some decent wins at Cruiser, he's a good solid fighter but he's not upper tier P4P material. Certainly not up there in a P4P sense with Canelo, Spence, Bud. And that's not a knock on Usyk, you know full well that the bar for being a great Cruiserweight or Heavyweight is much lower from a skills standpoint (especially these days) than being a great Welterweight, Middleweight, etc or lower weights. And that (skills) is what P4P is about.