Clinton Woods resume

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JonOli, May 7, 2008.


Page 4 of 4
  1. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    If resumes on judges on who you lose to rather than who you beat, Peter Buckley would be an All Time Great. And its only prime jones that seperates the level of comp they have faced.

    joke thread.
     
    jc, May 8, 2008
    jc, May 8, 2008
    #46
  2. wayne3280

    wayne3280 Active Member Full Member

    813
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    Why even ask the question, given the way you've written it? ****ing spastic...
     
    wayne3280, May 8, 2008
    wayne3280, May 8, 2008
    #47
  3. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Ive never suggest Woods is a better fighter, no one in there Right mind would, but there is a good possibility he has fought better opposition, there is no doubt about it. Stop the Calzaghe nut hugging and get over it.


    Woods had the balls to get in the ring with the best, Joe didn't! Stop making Calzaghe out to be something he isn't. You will be talking about his killer KO punch next, you know the one he had in a mythical age that in truth never existed.

    Joes a great fighter, but his resume is not out of this world, any one with half an eye can see that. He's been protected by Warren all his career and I really can't believe that so many people fall for Warrens PR. Your believing everything he wants you to and sells you!


    *and don't even bother stating the validity of Glen Johnson again when it is widely known and accepted that Joe dropped out of a proposed fight with him and ducked him like the plague. Woods fought the guy three times, while Joe hid. FACT*

    Nobody is suggesting that Woods is a better fighter, he isn't even anywhere near the same level as Joe, but he's faced some very good opponents. Its an insult to the man to laugh at his opposition and think it incomparable to Calzaghe whos resume is questioned by so many.
     
    JonOli, May 8, 2008
    JonOli, May 8, 2008
    #48
  4. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Woods has by far, fought the better fighters. I think that anyone that trys to argue that point should be discounted. However winning still means something. Woods lost to almost all the top guys that he fought.
     
    1lehudson, May 8, 2008
    1lehudson, May 8, 2008
    #49
  5. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Besides Jones (who is miles ahead of the lot), Calzaghe has the better names, including David Starie who had an easy enough night against Woods.

    Glen Johnson is not that impressive of a name...
     
    China_hand_Joe, May 8, 2008
    China_hand_Joe, May 8, 2008
    #50
  6. KilltheKing

    KilltheKing Overthrower Full Member

    895
    0
    Apr 1, 2008

    besides Hop it would be a better scalp than any on Joey's resume ... but Johnson will just have to sleep soundly knowing he got ducked because Joe just couldn't muster the will to go there ....
     
    KilltheKing, May 8, 2008
    KilltheKing, May 8, 2008
    #51
  7. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    joe has the better resume and is the better boxer but woods had courage to face them all..For once he didn't hide in the U.K and went on to the US to fight a prime jones. This time jones is shot and calzaghe wants a shot at the guy who is shot:yep
     
    CJLightweight, May 8, 2008
    CJLightweight, May 8, 2008
    #52
  8. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Calzaghe has BEATEN better fighters therefore Joe has a better resmue.
     
    196osh, May 9, 2008
    196osh, May 9, 2008
    #53
  9. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    WOW, good question...BTW, WOODS has the more stellar resume
     
    41fever, May 9, 2008
    41fever, May 9, 2008
    #54
Page 4 of 4