[CLIP] Rocky Marciano was a refined boxer by the time he met Joe Louis in the ring

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, May 15, 2018.



  1. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,597
    May 13, 2014
    I respect both you and Rez a lot. Here how I see his viewpoint.

    Eseentially that there is nothing new under the sun, by the even the 1930's most techniques were already known, highly developed and taught to the best athletes on the planet at that time. They used what worked for them and in doing so became champions in their own time.

    There tends to be a bias against the old timers due in part to the **** poor films we have of fights from back then, which were often fuzzy, shakey and occasionally off speed. The film taken back then is distorting the realistic abilities of former champions.

    Rez does what he does to try and rectify that bringing the old films into modern HD. Which I probably don't need to tell you is an amazing thing and a tremendous service to boxing as whole. He's collaborated with me before and every time I even think about writing on a black and white fight, I message him to see if he has a clean HD version of it so I can help explain and show the skills that some of the old timers possess. He usually does.

    That said the way he approaches these arguments sometime is poorly thought out. He'll provide a short clip and then get into a pissing match when somebody inevitably says it's too small in scope to claim a certain guy is as good as Rez seems to believe he is. He argues poorly despite the invaluable service he provides to boxing as a whole. I'm willing to believe he has far more footage than shows up on here and in his highlights. But while he's watching the clean HD stuff we all have to go off the warped, shakey stuff from the 1930's.

    I like him, he's passionate but goes to far sometimes and gets personal. He tends to hurt his own case a bit because of it. Have mercy on the guy, sure he can be a ass sometimes, but he's doing gods work man.
     
    Bokaj, mrkoolkevin and mcvey like this.
  2. red cobra

    red cobra VIP Member Full Member

    38,044
    7,483
    Jul 28, 2004
    Yeah, I think it is..the point that my post was trying to make was that Marciano's whole approach of offense had radically changed in that Moore bout...none of the wild abandon, loading up for that sensational, one punch ending and all that associated wildness that he was sometimes guilty of...instead, he seemed to be fighting more of a steady, methodical, somewhat "programmed" even "robotic" sort of onslaught vs Moore...not "refined" inasmuch as just steady and brutally effective. Marciano really "had it down" with that machine like, unchanging beat down of ol' Archie.
     
    Unforgiven likes this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,867
    Jun 2, 2006
    You can justifiably make that claim,what no one can do is justify calling him a refined boxer when he met Louis and I would argue he never became one at any stage of his career. That in no way demeans him, its just saying it as it is.
     
    mrkoolkevin and red cobra like this.
  4. red cobra

    red cobra VIP Member Full Member

    38,044
    7,483
    Jul 28, 2004
    I don't believe that Rocky was a "refined boxer" at all when he met Louis. That's stretching it a bit too far. What I'm alleging what he became by that 49th fight of his was something else altogether.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  5. red cobra

    red cobra VIP Member Full Member

    38,044
    7,483
    Jul 28, 2004
    Rocky was never a "refined boxer" IMO.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,867
    Jun 2, 2006
    You know what I'm going to ask now don't you?
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 Officer Full Member

    36,838
    3,274
    Sep 14, 2005
    I am as big a Marciano fan as anyone here, and I can acknowledge his limitations, short comings, and the holes in his resume. It's too bad certain posters place him on such a high pedestal and overrate some of his victims like lastarza, Matthews, and cockell
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 Officer Full Member

    36,838
    3,274
    Sep 14, 2005
    You nailed it. You know who agrees with you? Charlie Goldman. He said the Moore fight was marcianos best.

    I would have liked to have seen the rock in one more fight, vs Patterson in may of 1956. I think he had one more good on left
     
  9. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,597
    May 13, 2014
    I tend to agree with you Rocky's, physical attributes essentially limit him to only be able to get really good at the swarming half of the boxing game. He did what he had to with what he had. He probably isn't going to outbox anybody, his mastery of the swarming half of the game meant he never really had to either.
     
    ETM and mcvey like this.
  10. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,131
    Nov 19, 2016
    One thing is sure.. Marciano is the slowest great hw ever on his feet. Foreman got the absurd fame of being slow like a mummy weighing 220-230 pounds and marciano was slow like crap at 185 and nobody mentions this FACT
     
  11. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,597
    May 13, 2014
    Weirdly enough they are arguably the two best ring cutters heavyweight boxing has ever seen too.
     
    Webbiano likes this.
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,203
    34,939
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'm not sold a guy as light as Marciano was slower on his feet than all the big greats. Foreman was pretty slow on the whole.
     
    red cobra likes this.
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,867
    Jun 2, 2006
    Slow feet will learn you that!
     
    red cobra likes this.
  14. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,131
    Nov 19, 2016
    Foreman never was slow on his feet,in his early career he was pretty dinamic and rocky was pretty ponderous for a 185 guy.
    Foreman was more slow with his hands not on his feet
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,203
    34,939
    Apr 27, 2005
    Just because Marciano is 185 doesn't mean we judge him more harshly than a bigger guy like Foreman. They were both heavyweights.

    I champion Foreman often but i'd sure never call him dynamic on his feet. Sure he cut the ring off well but "dynamic"? Nah.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.