Clips of Andre Dirrell running and hugging Carl "So easy" Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danny_Rand, Nov 22, 2009.


  1. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    "Dirrell was way too negative and he complained to the referee way too much also"

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=21772&more=1

    Just do a Google search for "Dirrell Froch negative" and look at all the hits.

    The common takeaway from the fight was that Dirrell did not want to fight. It's a shame he "fought" that way, but he did and Froch ended up getting Dirrell into a brawl so that there would actually be some version of a fight instead of a no-contact race.

    Froch was dirty as hell in that fight, but he did not initiate the spoiling/dirty tactics.
     
  2. PatrickP

    PatrickP Active Member Full Member

    1,064
    0
    Jul 13, 2009
    :rofl
     
  3. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Brawl. More like onesided beat down. However Dirrell did focus on the ref a little too much. But I've never been hit 100 times in the back of the head, or body slammed during a boxing match, so I can see where he was coming from.
     
  4. burzumboy

    burzumboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,926
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    just spin on it seriously. i can't believe i'm doing this but i'm going to get into an argument about this because it simply wasn't a robbery. by the way the diaz v malignaggi fight was also close but the scorecards were the problem there (it could have gone either way), so don't even attempt to label these two fights in the same category as whitaker v chavez. oh and i haven't seen the cintron fiht so i'm not going to lay down my 2 cents in regards to that fight.
    just do me a favour and kill yourself.
     
  5. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Froch was dirty as hell, no doubt about it. But he didn't start the spoiling/dirty tactics, that's the difference.

    The fight sucked -- I won't argue with you about that.

    Kessler gets credit because he didn't "go Froch" on Ward. So that's a plus. But it may have cost him the fight.
     
  6. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Post your scorecard then. I've gotten really good at exposing those who cant score a fight. If you know boxing, Froch should win no more then 4 rounds. So post your scorecard and lets see how deep the dumbass hole goes. :yep
     
  7. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Again. I know you dont know about boxing. But boxing off the back foot and clenching is not illegal. Dirty tactics are more in the line of body slamming your opponent and hitting behind the head. But you've covered boxing for years right? :lol:

    From round 10-12 it was great. Froch got the whooping he should have been getting the whole fight.

    So is that what Euro fighters do? When they are getting clearly outboxed, resort to body slams and hitting behind the head?
     
  8. burzumboy

    burzumboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,926
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    115-113. yes i welcome your stupidity, please hit me with a tsumani of your ******edness.
     
  9. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    No your scorecard dumbass. As in how you scored every round. NOt some meaningless 115-113 score, which I struggle to see how you could get when round 10 was clearly 9-9
     
  10. burzumboy

    burzumboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,926
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    oh well considering the fact that the fight occured more then a month ago, i don't tend to keep **** lying around. and i'm sure you'll say this is an excuse, but i don't particularly care, but unless your planning on putting a gun to my head then i don't think i'll be partaking in that shitty fight again.
     
  11. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    [php][/php]
    Exactly. run along now fool.
     
  12. burzumboy

    burzumboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,926
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    suck a big bag of dicks, it was you who brought up this piece of **** which isn't worth bandwidth.
     
  13. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Had Dirrell fought that way the entire fight, he would have had a good chance at winning.

    Fighting off the back foot is one thing. Floyd's good at it, some feel Cotto was good at it in the final 4 rounds against Mosley. I prefer a come-forward fighter and often reflect that in my scorecards.

    Dirrell didn't want to engage hardly at all. He didn't seem to want to fight, much as Akinwande didn't seem to want to fight Lewis. That was the general perception of the fight, as you will find in most write-ups, your own boxing "expertise" notwithstanding.