Everyone needs to stop all this bull**** about how Pacquiao-Marquez 3 was a robbery. The fight was close and could have gone either way, and really I think a draw is the best way to score that fight. In no way was there a robbery. These days anytime a fighter loses, the fans of that fighter will cry about robbery and it's pathetic. A robbery is when one fighter clearly wins undisputably and the other fighter is awarded the decision, not when a fight is close on both sides.
This sounds good, but when you consider that there were three close fights and none in Marquez favor then it's a problem.
"Close fights are never robberies!" Bull... If it's a twelve rounder and one boxer clearly wins 6 and the other rounds can go either way it can even be a draw without being a robbery, but NEVER a win for the other guy! So close fights CERTAINLY can be robberies! edit: same goes for 6 rounds all, with a point deduction
3 times man, really.... 3 times, im sorry if the kettles black imma call it black, that shits gross robbery. JMM won 2 of those fights at least.
8-4 is not close....and the rounds manny won weren't even huge rounds...atleast marquez staggered manny a few times.....disgusting ****en fight