from the fans perspective, it would be pac -bradley since bradley fought him. floyd did not fight pac, he prevented a fight from happening which upset the fans for the supposed fight of the century and they called it a schooling.lol
http://forums.sherdog.com/forums/f53/what-your-mayweather-pacquiao-scorecard-2989683/index2.html http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=191292 Look at these two threads to gauge an average score, 2 or 3 rounds to Pac is the most recurrent score. http://www.badlefthook.com/2015/7/6/8900163/mayweather-vs-pacquiao-two-months-later-a-review Or this excellent ****ysis. I'm a big fan of both fighters and was neutral but I believe he won 4,6 and potentially 10 but Mayweather had a good case for that round too, rounds are scored over THREE minutes.
Pac-Bradley was actually a close fight that I though Pac edged. Mayweather-Pacquiao wasn't close at all and only people who literally worship Pacquiao are trying to pretend it was.
What do you mean closer? The problem with boxing and MMA scoring, is the rounds are scored 10-9. So A can beat B 120-108 by barely nicking every round. A good example is Ward-Bika. Dirty fight but it was close yet Ward was barely winning most rounds. Pacquiao-Bradley both times was competitive regardless of the score, but Pac cleanly won twice. Pac won 8-4 both times for me. Pacquiao-Mayweather was just a bad fight altogether where neither guy landed much. Mayweather won a close but clean fight. I scored it 7-5/8-4.