Clottey softened Cotto up for Pac. Why did it take Pac 12 long rounds to TKO Cotto?

Looks like someone is in denial

 

Pac and Marquez were featherweights when they fought plus May had a size advantage, weight advantage, speed advantage, etc. **** he should've toke him out!

 

:rofl I like Floyd as a fighter but by no means am I going to see him as a "perfect being" like this TS and Nallege do.

 

Obvious troll thread guys come on don't jump in that !

 

Are they 16 now? I'm not going to entertain your buffonery.

 

Alright I'm done. I'm not going to entertain this troll anymore.

 

the mayweather vs baldomir fight was as boring/bad as this thread:hi:

 

You could also say Cotto took everything from Margarito:good Margarito would never be the same again, mark my words if he gets his license back and steps with an elite fighter.

 

Shane was also softened up by Cotto, Floyds fighting a Cotto left over.
p4p no. 2atsch

 

Well maybe it took Pacquiao "12 long/hard rounds" because Cotto wasn't shot. That's just your assumption. Clottey didn't hit Cotto as much as Pacquiao did...keep that in mind. This is a ridiculous thread anyway. three months later, people still are trying to find reasons why Cotto got beat. Cotto just got beat by a better fighter. Another point - another ref could have stopped the fight in the 9th, so it wouldn't have went "12 long/hard rounds". And last but not least...did you watch the fight? Did you notice that Pacquiao put Cotto on his ass TWICE? The only reason Cotto survived after the 9th was because he was hauling ass.

 

He was much better prepared for Clottey...


And ran like a ***** from the moment Clottey gave him 30 free shots and then told him "quit playin"


But you are right about one thing... Pac whipped his ass good. I don;t know if I agree that Clottey softened him up, but you gotta admit he took a lot of punishment from Clottey.

 

floyd is a ***** too we know that.

the no. 1 and 2 are a pack of primadonnas.