C'mon admit it... Mayweather winning was best for boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ReactQ, Dec 9, 2007.


  1. ReactQ

    ReactQ New Member Full Member

    56
    0
    May 4, 2007
    Hatton obviously had no business even being in the ring with Mayweather. He only had one possible way to win, and Floyd quickly neutralized that with a good stiff elbow to the throat and good clinching and counterpunching.

    I like Hatton, but ever since Kosta Tszyu Ricky has become a very one dimensional fighter. In the end, would him winning actually have been good for the sport? Would you rather have a bunch of young fighters trying to emulate Hatton's rough housing, wrestling, aggressive style or would you rather see a bunch of younger fighters trying to emulate Floyd's slick technical offensive and defensive style?

    Hatton's fighting style may be entertaining, but Floyd's is simply a better showcase of the sweet science.
     
  2. JAM Killer

    JAM Killer Coming Through. Full Member

    1,274
    0
    Nov 5, 2006
    Yeah, it is good that Money May keeps winning, his personality and skill brings people to the sport, and is a constant reminder that boxing is superior to MMA.
     
  3. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    16
    Jul 29, 2007
    of course it was!!

    who wants a pro wrestler like hatton winnig a boxing match.