C'mon now! Pac is not an animal or something! Just exciting, nothing more nothing les

I know everybody is entitled to his/her own opinion but DAMN! Putting VAzquez ahead of PAC ?!! :huh atsch :huh atsch .

I don't mind the rest of the list ahead of pac (like I said you are entitled to your own opinion) is some sort of INSULT to pac! :hey

What ever made you think VAZQUEZ deserves to be higher than pac and palvic?

Looking forward to your reply..

 

at the end of the day, jmm's best achievements are his matches with pac. if pac is not given his due for beating MAB because he is old, then jmm should also not be given props for beating an older MAB. and he should not be given anything for beating juarez who mab beat twice.

is pac is hated on for taking on larrios and solis, jmm did not do better either for taking on jandaeng and jaca. jmm lost to john, pac lost to morales, but he defeated him twice. jmm never fought john again.

pac was a champ at 112, 122, 126, and now 130. jmm held titles in 126 and 130 only. pac defeated the best 112 champ is sasakul and the best 122 champ in ledwaba in those times.

pac should have won their first match if not for that judge who gave a 10-7 to the first round becasue he did not know giving out a 10-6 is possible. how you can still rate jmm above pac is beyond me.

 

WOW!

Did Manny touch you in a bad place as a child? Did he molest your baby sister? Maybe he pissed in your chocolate milk?

While I have Pac at #2 P4P, I'd be willing to listen to somebody justify his standing anywhere from 3-5. 7??? Now you're just being silly.

 

Excuse me? What was the message in reply too?

 

Pac fans are too sensitive. Do you really have to protest any discourtesy that is accorded to Pacquiao? Some posters just want to **** you off and you readily accept the challenge. Boxeo#1 wants to put Pacquiao at #7, then so be it. It's not like he is the bible of P4P ranking that everything he says should be taken seriously.

 

Are you kidding me dude? You think in order to be special you can't just get a UD on a Barrera, Morales, and Marquez, BUT....Should DOMINATE these guys?! Any guy who dominates any of those 3 fighters is one bad mofo that I wouldn't only say there the best P4P fighter in the world, but BEST FIGHTER IN THE WORLD! Those guys are 3 of the most elite fighters in the world themselves.
You say he's no Roy Jones, etc. I never followed boxing very closely til recently, but who has Roy Jones DOMINATED in his divisions that would compare to Barrera, Morales, and Marquez of that division? The only one that he even beat that was an elite fighter (that I'm aware of) was Hopkins.
Same goes for Mayweather. Your going to argue he's not in these guys levels because he couldn't decimate 3 elite fighters...Whenever they, themselves, don't have a dominating victory on anybody that would rank up with these guys.

 

You forgot 122. Pac won 4 world titles.(126 ring belt...peoples champ)

 

In other words, you agree pac should b e # 7 in the list?

 

pac is a animal, hes not the best boxer by far.erik, mab, marquez, and one or two others are all better boxers then him.yet the can **** with pac because he is a animal.hes fast like one, hits like one, can take a lick like one, has the beast in him.

only way he gets beat now is when he moves to far up in weight and punches start hurting him more and other fighters can take his left better.

but manny is a beast dumbass !!

 

No. That's his ranking and he obviously did it just to **** you (Pac fans) off. So far he is successful.

 

i guess being a 4-weight and 3-division lineal champ isn't that great afterall... atsch :-(

 

Pac is a special fighter. People will realize it moreso when he is retired.

The original poster is wrong, clear as day. The thread title belongs more to a Gatti type fighter.

 

Actually, acb's right.:good