Mark Coleman was the best HW in the world for a short while. My view is once he began training his cardio to fight for 25 minutes he was a great fighter. Mark Hunt is not a great fighter, but he could fight great. Amongst his win list is the likes of Wandy, Cro Cop and Mir. 3 legends of MMA. He's also beaten top fighters like Kohsaka, Rothwell, Congo, Struve and Silva. If Hunt keeps it standing surely he wins as he's one of the best strikers in MMA. If Coleman takes him down surely he wins as Hunt had a woeful ground game. Looking at troubling losses, Hunt has a trio of losses in the first round to Manhoef, Mousasi and McCorckle. But he had stopped training at that point before his recent rejuvenation. Coleman has two bad losses to Smith and William's both of which he dominated before gassing out, but that was before he'd trained conditioning before who's rejuvenation. So who wins this battle of the Mark's? The great fighter or the man who fought great?