Coming from a Pachugger, I think Cal breezed past Pac to get #2 pfp

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DobyZhee, Apr 20, 2008.


  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,917
    13,717
    Mar 5, 2006
    It wasn't pretty, but neither was Pacquiao's win last March. I think the difference is Cal fought a fighter who threw less punches back when getting hit. Pac fought a much tougher opponent pfp than Cal fighting B-Hop but Marquez put up a much better fight pfp than Hopkins. You could factor in that Hopkins has been on a losing streak since losing to jermaine Taylor but the bottom line is Cal has been looking good compared to Pac.
     
  2. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    :huh
     
  3. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    I think Calzaghe is #2 as well.
     
  4. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Actually, Hopkins had won his last 2 fights since the Taylor matches. But either way, I kinda get your point.

    I still have Pacquiao number 2 though...
     
  5. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    You really need to tell your wife to slide her hand up a little closer to her bellybutton it's distracting as hell:oops:
     
  6. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    :rofl:rofl
     
  7. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,917
    13,717
    Mar 5, 2006
    Its 1:00, I'm tired as f*ck. The clubs were jumpin' and I swear this was the funnest non holiday weekend I've had in Vegas in awhile.
     
  8. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    i still have Pac ahead of him, he got KD'd in the first round, by someone considered "old" similar to Pac fighting an "old JMM". But, as we all know, that Pac and JMM's style compliments each others strengths. Its hard to look good in that situation. but against other opponents PAC looked better than joe did to his.
     
  9. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Cal has been looking good compared to pac?! Since when? Since his LAST DOMINATING FIGHT with a PRIME FIGHTER Bhop.

    If CAL DEMOLISHED BHOP on his prime. I have to agree with you buddy!

    C'mon! By winning a likewise UNIMPRESSIVE win over a SUPER PRIME 43 years old (much older than papa nate!) would make him #2 p4p?

    I would congratulate Cal for his win. A win is a win correct?! But puting him to #2 p4p for that kind of win :huh Am I missing something here?!

    Can you really say DAMN! CAL sent Bhop to school!?! Sorry dude! Pac sticks to #2 as far as my books in concerned...
     
  10. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    Settle down, it was just his opinion :rasta

    You forgot to end your post with these :rofl :lol: :lol: :rofl
     
  11. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Oh yeah! I forgot!

    :lol: :rofl :lol:
     
  12. djfonti

    djfonti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,547
    1,782
    Jun 25, 2005
    **** sake, who ****ing cares about P4p lists, they make no sense and are for children.....only paper ATG big up their relevance, like Mayweather.
     
  13. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    Hell, yeah!
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    ....you forgot to add! This ESB has to sense to our children at all! It takes "TIME" away from our children! :lol: :lol: :lol: Wether PBF is #1 or # 100 ATG! ...that sounds more logical :D
     
  15. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    pac is still number 2 imo, neither fighter was impressive but c'mon almost everyone was expecting total dominance of calzaghe whereas pac-jmm was a 50-50 or a 60-40. And pac has clearly got more names on his ledger than calzaghe, calzaghe needs to do more.