There is no comparison! Pac's fights are very exciting, wars!!! Void's fights are not much of anything, boring, very boring. Pac's opponents are so much better also. Pac stopped Oscar, Void barely won a split decision, should have lost. Pac stopped Hatton in two, Void? Where was Void? Pac stopped Cotto, great fighter, Void refused to even fight Cotto. No wonder Void, Sr. said that he did not want Void, Jr. to fight Pac after the Cotto fight! Go ahead, compare! Pac is good for boxing, Void is not.
Here's my ******* impression: Pac fights: :happy:happy:happy:bbb:bbb:bbb:ko:ko:ko Void fights: :???::???::???: :zzz:zzz:zzz
LOL! Void fans can't compare Pac's fights with Void's because they know that Pac is the fighter, Void is the fake hero of theirs. Void is truly void and Void, Sr. said it all when he said that he did not want Void, Jr. to fight Pac! Yep, he said it all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Void fans are ashamed of their fake hero. They can't compare the fights because they do not have a leg to stand on! LOL! Void fans do not want this fight to happen at all. Void requires different rules of boxing for Pac, yet never for any of his other opponents! That tells me a lot, esp. along with Void, Sr.'s statement! Then simple compare their fights! Who is exciting to watch?! Who is it? Yes, it's Pac, no comparision!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
this is an obvious troll thread started by troll number 1, but i'll say pac appeals to brawlers, people who like punching more than boxing, underdog fans (when he was an unknown, and again when he was moving up weights). nothing wrong, if thats what you like. floyd appeals to people that prefer pure boxing over brawling, people who like to see him pick a ponent apart over 12 instead of the quick ko...again, noithing wrong, if its what you like. some people like punchers, some like boxers
Apples to oranges. I completely agree. Ali and Frazier were comparable to Floyd and Manny. Ali had many unanimous decisions on his record however his style and entertainment with the footwork won over the crowd. Not his punching power. Frazier was just a brawler with reckless power. No need to outbox an opponent. He was just beat them to death. It is all about what style you like. Manny is fun to watch but he does not have skill. He is methodical. Very much so. Floyd is only fun to watch because he is tactical and entertaining to other boxers such as myself. There is always a chance Manny will be knocked out but not with Floyd. You get excited to see him hit and react to it. It is rare but it happens. Apples to oranges.
I guess that if you like watching two guys going straight at each other and bashing heads in like a Toughman Competition more than you enjoy watching the best technical fighter in the world put on yet another sweet science clinic, you would prefer Duckquiao. High Boxing IQ individuals enjoy Mayweather Lower Boxing IQ individuals enjoy Pacquicheat
hmm says . . . all on personal preference.. I think both fighters have embraced the sweet science in their own respective way, but out of the two, I find Pac more exciting by far since he's not afraid to get hit and wants to go for a KO. stylistic analogy... Pac is like a run-n-gunner with a machine and shotgun; not afraid to go into the front lines... PBF is like a sniper... stays away from harm, is calculating, and take shots that count pick your favorite....
