compare teh level of Roy's shotness with the Tyson that lost to Williams

Tyson gets knocked out by Euro level heavyweight Danny Williams.

Jones loses on points to future HOF Calzaghe.

 

I disagree, even if you take out the level of opposition, Roy was reasonably competitive most of the fight. Tyson was a 4 round fighter by the time he fought Williams.

 

Have you seen your arse over this? You made a point , I made a point.....whats your problem? Did you start the thread with the hope that everyone would agree with you and tell you what a clever guy you are?

 

Jones lost one of his main tools, his legs!

 

Jones was almost put to a coma by Johnson over 3 years ago!

so about the same shotness

 

Johnson was a genuine world class 175lber for a number of years, Williams was well.....lets be honest not ever really a world class heavyweight.

 

um jones was competitive for the first 6 rounds, and he won the first 2. He was hitting Calzaghe pretty regularly for the first half of the fight as well. I rewatched it last night and today.

Tyson against Williams was WAY more shot then Jones (who isn't shot). In fact if you want the pure definition of a shot fighter, watch tyson anytime post 1996 -- THAT's a shot fighter.

 

That's the way both wins will be looked at, it's strange you open the thread I was comparing that win exactly to Williams' win over Tyson in another discussion.

 

Settle down.....