Comparison PBF (146) vs JMM (144) and PAC (146) vs JMM (144)

This really isn't rocket science.

Pac and JMM were pretty evenly matched at 130.

Pac is now clearly stronger, faster, and better above 140.

JMM was clearly worse above 140. Overweight, sluggish, no snap in his punches.

So, going from evenly matched, to one of them being clearly better, and one of them being clearly worse, and the result is obvious.

 

Don't even waste your time. Once it gets down to plain stupidity, there no more reason to continue arguing with them.

Seriously, what are you going to teach a moron who bases his knowledge off polls conducted on ESB??? :yep

And this is precisely why the Boxing world despises *******s.

 

I honestly cant even give you an answer for that! You hit it right on the head...Its really pointless!

But hey, let the guy make a fool of himself, would be a better answer while we sit back and laugh at him!:rofl

 

Seriously man, Uli does have a point...you're sit here doing the exact samething you're bitching at Uli about...Look, I respect the **** out of Pacman and have admired his work since leaving the lower wieght classes but he recieves the critics because of the stuff you say...If somebody disagrees you're quick to label them a Floydette or a Fraudette...See what I mean...you're bitching about it but you're doing the exact samething you're blaming others of doing!atsch

 

DONT BE MAD CUZ THE "FLOYDETTES" AS U PUT IT NO MORE ABOUT THE SPORT THAN YOU AND THEY ARE OWNING YOU OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN:nut

 

He's a dumb *****, plain and simple.

 

No one gives a **** about your poll, its been done to death. Now **** off and go play in traffic.