Complete List of Scores from Boxing Writers/Experts/Fighters

did he? i saw pac sitting back a lot in the last 4 rounds. lampley said it himself. pac was only fighting the last 30 seconds.

i saw pac coming forward missing a lot of punches. i saw bradley use the same moves over and over again to avoid pacs punches.

i will say pac landed the bigger punches...and more of them in certain rounds...but there were plenty of rounds where bradley's activity and defense were better than pac following him around mindlessly in the ring.

pac couldn't cut the ring off. i've never seen him miss as much as he did in this fight. look at both guys faces at the end of that fight and tell me bradley wasn't landing punches.

 

Because the opponents don't do much. Bradley did a little bit more, but not enough to keep the fight close.

I had it 117-111.

And would be okay with:

118-110
117-111
116-112


115-113 is a real stretch in my opinion. The other scores are crazy!

 

the fans are the writers. if we allow that...then basically boxing will become a popularity contest.

if that fight was a popularity contest...then pac wins hands down.

thank god boxing is not a popularity contest.

 

This has to be one of the most idiotic posts of all time. What's Cynthia J Ross's professional boxing record, again?

 

i'll have to get back to u on that. i have the fight dvr'd.

 

i'm not saying a pac win is out of the question. it's very possible. but 11-1 or 10-2 is ridiculous.

 

:nut

Well, it's obvious that according to Judge Roth these guys missed the BOXING clinic Bradley put on Pacquiao...

Roth please retire...:hat

 

Can anyone post a link to the original source of this list? Thanks.

 

i get what ur saying...but let's be honest....experience is the best teacher.

i'll take cynthia's opinion over dan rafaels. i'm sure she's followed the sport much longer and has scored waaaaaaaaay more fights than most writers.

 

the judges used to be boxers too....NOT!

 

Exactly,easy fight to score. Seen so many fights like this where one guy may LOOK busier but is doing **** all yet the other guy is a little more conservative but lands quality punches and dictates the flow and pace of the fight. Bradley was very scrappy, at no point was he ever the general in there. If someone wants to give him Bradley the first round, fine i can go with that even the last 2 rounds. That's pretty much it. He was getting beat every time he exchanged when he came forward and when he went backwards he didn't land anything, BUt Pac would always even in the close rounds fire off some better work by way of solid punching landing hard scoring shots, whilst Bradley would flap around trying to look busy.

Put it this way even if the punch stats had a margin of error by about 50 punches, Pacman would still have landed more than Bradley did. What does that tell you? the stats can't be THAT far wrong, and visually if you have 2 eyes and some common sense, you will easily see who did the better work in there.

Come on people! easy to see who won the fight.

 

u know something....i would like to know what most of these writers scores look like from other bouts. i've kind of tracked some of their predictions and analysis over the years...and i find that a good portion of these guys don't know what they are writing/talking about. it's the reason i don't really read any of their articles anymore. like i said in a previous post....experience is the best teacher. i'm willing to bet that judge roth has scored more fights than any of those writers have seen live.

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1656951

Compared to:

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1595865


And:

http://www.businessinsider.com/pacquiao-bradley-odds-2012-6

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/just_how_crazy_was_the_pacquiao_bradley_decision

 

mills lane used to box.

steve smoger used to box.

joe cortez used to box.

richard steele used to box.

they are officials....they all score fights as well.

 

Bingo! Well Put.