Compubox Shows Mosely Ahead

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by yesihavearm, Nov 10, 2007.


  1. yesihavearm

    yesihavearm Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    1
    May 15, 2007
    Total Punches Jabs Power Punches
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    Dont know about you but I count power-punches MORE than jabs.

    Mosely got robbed, end of.
     
  2. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Yes, Mosley out-threw Cotto and out-landed him in power punches.
     
  3. jonesjrp4p1

    jonesjrp4p1 16 yr old prodigy Full Member

    1,575
    15
    Mar 31, 2007
    mosley won that fight 116 - 112
     
  4. yesihavearm

    yesihavearm Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    1
    May 15, 2007
    Yup, Mosely won by 2 rounds at least.

    Bigger robbery than Tito against Oscar.
     
  5. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    Compubox don't really mean anything. The have no way to tell how effective the punches are. Look at the Pavlik vs Taylor fight. Taylor out landed him but who won the fight? Pavlik.
     
  6. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cotto had the better percentage overall. He outboxed Mosley.
     
  7. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    in most cases I agree wtih counting power shots against jabs. The difference is that Cotto threw a very stiff jab tonight. The fight was pretty even on all counts, IMO.
     
  8. jlmayo825

    jlmayo825 Active Member Full Member

    534
    0
    Oct 1, 2007
    Cotto was 248 of 675 (37 percent) and Mosley connected on 248 of 774 punches (32 percent).

    Cotto was more effective with his shots cuz he landed at a better rate.

    Compubox aside..i had it 115-113 Cotto...would of been fine with a draw
     
  9. yesihavearm

    yesihavearm Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    1
    May 15, 2007
    Mosely landed more power punches.

    Now im no einstein, but if i was in a fight ID MUCH RATHER land more power punches than I would jabs.
     
  10. stilltharow

    stilltharow Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Mar 9, 2007
    respect must be shown to shane mosley he fought one hell of a fight, i think the fight should have been ruled as a draw was pretty much even.
     
  11. raiderjay

    raiderjay Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 7, 2007
    That is a decent argument except for the little fact that Shane had Cotto hurt and actually had him moving backwards for FOUR rounds while Shane was never clearly hurt. So whose power punches were more effective? Oh, apparently the guy who not only landed the harder shots, but also a greater amount. MOSLEY!
     
  12. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cotto's jab is a power punch. :deal
     
  13. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Round by round stats are needed. And Cotto's non-power shots were as powerful as many Mosley powershots.
     
  14. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    That was my score, also.
     
  15. yesihavearm

    yesihavearm Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    1
    May 15, 2007
    Giving Cotto the nod in this fight, is literally like giving Kessler the nod over Calzaghe last week.

    ****ing ridiculous