So you score for the guy who throws half as many punches and lands noticeably less while plodding forward, doing what, "looking cool" or something?
Except the stats show he landed more? Who cares about how mant times Parker wafted the air? Seriously, thats why you gave him the rounds? You're piling mystery onto your strangeness young man, bedways is rightways for you my brother.
Chocolatito vs Rungvsai 1 Gonzalez landed 150 more punches then Rungvsai. Who did you have winning that fight? Point is Punch stats don't count when scoring.
That's fair but also absolutely the closest you can score it. You have to have been looking for any reason to give rounds to Parker to score it that close.
Can see that being given. Only because someone needs to get the rounds and Joshua looked less worse than Parker in the swing rounds. In reality 5 rounds were probably 10-10's
Roman and Srisaket landed more shots per round than these two, this was a far easier fight to score. Neither guy landed much of anything, Parker was slightly more active in the majority of the rounds, therefore he wins on my card.
They count when lambasting 11-1 rnd scorecards when there were no perceptibly damging power shots ever in the fight
No punch stats are never taken into account, I agree the official scores were to wide, but AJ won 8-4.
If 6 power shots is worth more than 44 jabs then Canelo should have beaten Golovkin via shutout. Remind me, what was your scorecard for that fight? What about Gonzalez vs. Rungvisai I? Where Choc reportedly landed 95 more power punches and 62 more jabs... What was your scorecard for that fight?
Parker definitely didnt win. I was rooting for him, but by rnd 9 I knew he had blown it. Joshua did nothing impressive. Parker impressed me greater than AJ tonight. I guess AJ won the event, not clearly the rnds for me