Congrats on Fury, but Klitschko lose the match

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lordlosh, Dec 9, 2015.


  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    Exactly. Wlads loss had more to do with who was put in front of him.
     
  2. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    Wlad from haye fight would beat fury, all wlad need to beat fury is to land a few more punches every round , it's not like fury landed a lot or schooled him.
     
  3. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,307
    7,880
    Sep 2, 2011
    He was, still the way Wlad boxed in that fight and how he boxes now is completely different. If you somehow bring that same Mercer to 2015 with a time machine, you think Wlad would look as aggressive or as athletic as he did in that fight? Not a chance.

    BTW, I think that fight was Wlad before his actual prime however, since we're arguing whether Fury could beat "any" Wlad, he wouldn't beat that one. Stylistically it's a horrible match up for him.
     
  4. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    13
    Aug 12, 2015
    Fury beats any Wlad. Wlad loses against someone who can move and box. simple as that.

    Anyone who compares Pulev to Fury is simple and dumb.
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    That Mercer was on the same level as Alex Leapai , so yes.
     
  6. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,307
    7,880
    Sep 2, 2011
    Wlad didn't look like that vs Leapai.
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    If Fury was a small , slow , plodding over weight has been he would have been at a stylistic dis-advantage.

    Fury matches up more closely to Sanders. What on earth are you talking about:huh
     
  8. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,307
    7,880
    Sep 2, 2011
    I'm not arguing whether he's more like Sanders (and WTF, Fury is like Sanders?) or Mercer... I'm talking about Wlad here.

    Wlad lost because he had no aggression, he slowed down and I don't think his power is the same either, those are attributes that are very apparent in the Mercer fight regardless of who's in front of him.
     
  9. eltirado

    eltirado Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,706
    1,690
    Jul 31, 2013
    Fury beats any Version of Wlad
     
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    You said Wlad of the Mercer fight is - Stylistically it's a horrible match up for him.

    Fury is Stylistically the opposite to Mercer in every way shape and form.

    Wlad could light him up from the outside with no fear whatsoever of anything coming back.
     
  11. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,307
    7,880
    Sep 2, 2011
    I'm not comparing Fury to Mercer... Are you arguing that Wlad fights absolutely the same today (and is physicallt the same too) it was just a matter of a different opponent? If that's the case I don't agree with you.
     
  12. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    So much people with zero boxing knowing here ...
    Dino did you even think someone get you serious on this board? You get wrong prediction about Wlad for how long ?
    You was talking the same cr*** time after time. And finally you get it right when Wlad gets old.
    You are not a fan of boxing you are just a hater on this board.
    Klitschko jab is gone, even you say it in Pulev fight. He is as half as fast as he was before.
    That is easy to see to non biased fans, who can look 2006-2012 version of Wlad and see what speed he have in the legs and in the hands and what now.
    Its obvious his workate is dropped big time from 500-600 throwed punched to 100-200. Back then he was landing probably half of this shots, because of his accuracy and speed.
    Check how many he threw even in the Pulev fight. He throw less then 150 and land less then 40 ....
    By your idi**** logic Kevin McBride will beat any version of Mike Tyson right?
    And when Fury gets 39 years old and bum after bum beat his **** then we can talk how this guys was going to beat any version of Fury ?
    If i going to do discussion, then will be with someone who is not a biased hater and atleast know anything of the boxing.

    And Klitschko clinches more recently, after Manny passed away and because of his age. He can`t keep at the pace and to keeping guy at bay he need to throw more, but hes workrate is lower, because of the age factor and he will gas.

    And yeah i give Fury credit i say he is a good boxer with good movement and fast hands, with great reach and height, but any version till 2012 of Wlad will kill him.
    And i think if Wlad have better tactic he will do it in the rematch.
    And i stand by my word that he need new trainer.
    And a real fan stay with his fighter, and support him in the wins, but most imporantly in the losses. Otherwise is simply a hater like you. When someone beat your fighter you say he was a bum.
    I hope your tiny brain understand what i wrote.
     
  13. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
  14. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    13
    Aug 12, 2015

    I want to remind you of what you yourself said, before fury embarrasses klitchko.


    from this thread: http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=550583&page=2

    lol :|:|
     
  15. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    And so what? I can dig out a thousnd of such thread saying Wlad will lose there ot there and how he will duck this and this guy and most of them are from Dino ....
    And there is a plenty of my post when i say Klitschko is past it and that hes prime is 2006-2012 ....
    And what exactly is the evidence that Fury will beat any version of Wlad? That fight? When Wlad throw 100 punches ? And when Fury won by 3 rounds? And how exactly he won this rounds? By landing 2-3 more body shots or because threw few more? When prime Wlad is 50% faster, have more strengh and power, insane jab and have 5x time the workrate he have now. Or probably because Steward would not prepare him better ?
    How exactly Fury will win it there?
    BTW by HBO idi*** stats Fury was landed 5-6 head punches more ....
    Not to mention their punching statistic is crazy inacurracy. In one of the rounds Klitschko land uppercut and the statistic not count it. While counting just a touching shots ...