Conn versus Loughran

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Nov 22, 2011.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    yes, 175 wasn't jones' best weight but i'd take your bet in a second on this fight. saad was exciting to watch but i see him being bludgeoned in this match.
     
  2. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    Saad was much more than just "exciting to watch". That is a rookie statement to make. The man's skills get so overlooked by the casual fan it's sickening. Jones never faced anything like him at Lt. Heavy; a long, strong boxer-puncher with exceptional offensive skills, massive power, and fantastic instincts. If there's a type to deal with Jones, that's it.
     
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,327
    15,917
    Dec 20, 2006
    Wow, I never dreamed Conn would be running away with this, this badly
     
  4. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing

    23,559
    5,872
    Aug 19, 2010
    I think Conn looks better on film.....
    I voted for him in the poll....
     
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,327
    15,917
    Dec 20, 2006
    I think outside of Loughran being robbed against Tunney (I will stick with the Philadelphia Inquirer verdict), this would be the 2nd fight I would love to see him in.

    This should be a brilliant chess match, and xtremely close....or so I thought. It seems thatmany more see a Conn win than I would have excpected. I would have thought more of a 50/50 poll.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,714
    30,633
    Jun 2, 2006
    Loughran beat over 40 heavyweights ,and three of them held the tilte.
     
  7. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    Loughran boxed Baers ears off, whipped a young Braddock, and made Dempsey look bad in sparring leading up to the Tunney fight (and of you know how Dempsey treated his sparring partners you would be even more impressed). I think he has even odds of equaling what Conn did. Brilliant boxer, ATG jab, tough and clever. Real pick 'em fight.

    Also I think we're looking at this wrongly if we look at who was better at beating heavyweights. How Conn and Loughran did against boxers, stylist, and movers would probably be more revealing.
     
  8. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    1,372
    22
    Jul 13, 2012
    And that's were it gets complicated. Conn's most impressive feat against stylists was his competitive set with a prime 50 fights more experienced Yarosz, who, like Loughran, was a tricky SOB with no punch who worked extensively behind the jab and was very good at tying his man inside. Their set went 2-1 to Conn officially, though his two were SDs one of which was a highly unpopular decision. Hardly conclusive. Loughran's best stylist opponents I know of were Tunney and Jack Delaney. He also fought both when he was green and was also very competitive against them (fought Tunney to a controversial draw some thought he won and Delaney on a set that ended 0-1-1). Not that conclusive either. The reason I'm giving a shade to Conn is cause the style he showed against Louis was not the only one he knew (he could box smoothly from the outside) so I think he could do well enough from the outside and get the better in close. UD Conn for me.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Hard one to call. I would give the edge to Conn
     
  10. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    27
    Jun 4, 2009
    I love this series but the decisions were a raging controversy.
    To Billys credit he was very young and pre prime.
    Yarosz was arguably past peak with a torn up knee.
    Billy always said Yarosz was unhittable.
     
  11. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    102
    Jul 20, 2010
    So did Ken Overlin and Nate Bolden. Or words to that effect.