Controversial boxing opinions

fitz is way 2 open with his left way out like that and he hops around like a ******ed kangaroo with a dildo stuck up his ass. corbett looks very similar too fitz and most of these early guys fought like that, the g-string wearing fairies

 

Corbett and Fitz are about as close in style as Tunney and Dempsey, Ali and Frazier or Lewis and Tyson.

 

no their stance is the same and they hop around similar if someone like peter manfredo was around back then he would have destroyed all those guys they are massively overated

 

Roy Jones Jr in his prime would EASILY beat any fighter in history from Middleweight to Light-Heavyweight.

Hagler is the best Middleweight ever.

Greb is so damn overrated it scares me.

Duran was a weak resume.

George Foreman has a disgustingly weak resume.

Mike Tyson would beat every Heavyweight in history apart from 60s Ali.

Joe Louis fares very bad H2H.

Riddick Bowe in his prime would beat Joe Louis in his prime.

Julian Jackson was the best/hardest puncher in history by FAR.

Hagler beats Robinson at MIDDLEWEIGHT (Robinson was beaten by lesser fighters at MW, and therefore Hagler could definitely beat him)

Prime Bowe beats Prime Lennox.

Joe Gans beat Duran and Benny Leonard.

Moore is the greatest Light-Heavyweight ever.

 

Joe Frazier,warrior as he was,felt apprehensive about giving Muhammad Ali a rematch for the title over 1972. He only fought him again when it was the route to a rematch with Foreman,and yet again when Ali had won the title back from Foreman.

 

Leonard of New Orleans beats any Duran that ever campaign at 147lbs.

Myung Woo Yuh is almost unbeatable in a firefight, which is why I'd favour him over Chang.

Ricardo Lopez isn't nearly as great as advertised, he'd have struggled with Carbajal at 108lbs.

Aaron Pryor isn't an ATG. His best win is questionable to put it mildly.

At least three or four other Light Heavyweights would have knocked out a prime Roy Jones Jr.

 

khaosai galaxy was great

prizefighter results should never end up on pro records

and as someone said already...mike dokes could have been a good champ.

 

well...only for money reasons...he got 2.5 mill for the first ali fight, but was only being offered 750 grand for rematch....its in his book

 

Funniest quote of the year so far by some way - nearly fell off my chair laughing at the bit about mthe ******ed kangaroo with the dildo up his ass - and then the g-string wearing fairies nearly made me have a cardiac arrest :rofl:rofl:rofl

PS my controversial one is....Rocky Marciano is the greatest heavyweight champion of all time - very rare that I see anyone going the distance with him either in his absolute peak

 

In the period between and including the LaPorte fight and the Pedroza fight, Barry Mc Guigan gives Azumah Nelson all he wants. Not saying he'd win but he'll give him a good argument.

Razor Ruddock had the talent, if not the discipline, to be a (fairly)dominant champ in the early 90s.

Aaron Pryor is a better fighter than given credit for.

 

i think nelson would have toyed with mcguigan

 

James Toney from the Holyfield fight would beat post-prison Tyson and any version of Holyfield.

Vitali Klitschko, Lennox Lewis, and Tyson destroy prime Foreman early.

Gamboa may be the best featherweight h2h of the last 20 years.

 

I know this is a controversial thread but for **** sake. :-(( Jorge Solis? ...Really?

 

Fighters before 1920 looked quite shite compared to modern standards. Fitzimons and Corbett look like rank amateurs in the film of their fight.

McCallum would beat Hearns more thoroughly than Leonard did, and probably also beat Hagler (very close one, though).

Vitaly looks absolutely horrendous. (Which isn't that controversial and also partly negates my first statement - but it had to be said)

Pac beat Marquez in both fights.

Ali's wins over Norton and Young weren't robberies. Norton beat Young by a quite comfortable margin.

 

I don't see why this would be controversial?