Controversial boxing opinions....

I dont actually think WW would!

 

Many of today's fighters, who aren't greats, would give tough fights to many of the great fighters of the past in their weight classes, simply based on being bigger men due to weigh-in rule changes.

 

PBF beats DLH in his prime if he neautralized the left hand. DLH in his prime was not very good at knowing what to do with his right hand. He was called a one handed puncher. HOWEVER, if Floyd got comfortable and took a risk as he used to take them, all it would take would be one left hook by DLH. In those days DLH turned every fight around when he landed that hook. This is why people still call into play the Quartey fight. I would say it would be similar with Floyd, a large punch to turn around the fight. I would say DLH by KO in the 8th. But very competitive with Floyd in the lead up until that point.

 

I scored Casamayor/Santa Cruz 116-111 for Casamayor.

 

True, but hardly controversial:good

 

Sugar Ray Robinson is not my #1 all time P4P. Pernell Whitaker and Benny Leonard are a head of him on my list.

 

Dont know how contraversial it is but Calzaghe batters Kelly Pavlik every day of the week.

 

Fair enough...only 149 to go...:roll:

 

Tell that to a Wlad nuhugger, they will give you every excuse in the book why he hit the deck 11 times and been TKO'd 3 times.:yep

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl

 

I totally agree. If not for Arguello, Pryor would be a mere footnote in boxing history.

Boo

 

Hey cocksucker, go watch more of your MMA, ***.

 

yep


mayweather beats prime tito an dlh

lennox lewis beats prime tyson foreman holmes
prime riddick bowe could beat joe louis

roy jones was always overrated

john ruiz has a very underated record

pacquiao is very average

 

I'm also sick of mythical matchups!