I never heard a compelling argument that could sway my opinion about the second fight between Michael Spinks and Larry Holmes. I feel like The Jinx clearly won the first bout, but I always scored the rematch 9-6 for Holmes. 8-7 would be a stretch, but how the hell can you find 9 rounds for Spinks in that one? Do we have anyone on this forum who scored the rematch for Mike? I would love the see the card!
Maybe you can give your round by round so then we can discuss. Here's mine and if you give all the close rounds for Spinks then I can def see it for him might need to rewatch though. Larry Holmes vs Michael Spinks II Round 1 10-9 Holmes Round 2 10-9 Holmes Round 3 10-9 Holmes Round 4 10-9 Holmes Round 5 10-9 Holmes (close) Round 6 10-9 Spinks (close) Round 7 10-9 Holmes Round 8 10-9 Spinks Round 9 10-9 Spinks Round 10 10-9 Spinks (close) Round 11 10-9 Holmes Round 12 10-9 Holmes Round 13 10-9 Spinks Round 14 10-9 Spinks Round 15 10-9 Holmes (close) 144–141 for Holmes
Well, I have Holmes as a victor, I'm just looking for the argument that Spinks won it, since it was an official decision and minority of the public indeed had him winning.
I never comprised a scorecard. But Spinks was relatively idle for the first four or five rounds which put him way behind Larry. That and Holmes was landing the more effective shots throughout the fight that had Spinks noticeably hurt. It wasn’t a domination by any means but I can’t see much of a case for giving that win to Spinks. A draw might have been reasonable but even that’s stretching it
The 36 year old Holmes faded towards the end of the fight but,in my opinion,he'd banked enough of the earlier rounds to have got the decision - and his title back.
I was convinced I had my scorecard on my phone, but turns out I have it on my previous one, LOL! Will have to go back to you with that one.