Corbett vs ATG Middleweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Jun 24, 2009.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    I think faster, smaller fighters might have more success against the dancing, tricky Corbett than large or ponderous heavyweights.

    Corbett was only slightly larger then a LHW regardless and many modern MW's are sawed off LHW's. So, how does Corbett do against the following in their respective primes?

    Bernard Hopkins

    Carlos Monzon

    Roy Jones

    James Toney

    Micheal Nunn (Oh how I'd love to see this)

    Sumbu Kalambay (Very same)

    Marvin Hagler

    Gene Fullmer

    Jake LaMotta
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Not so sure to be honest.

    He went through Charlie Mitchel prety convincingly and Kid McCoy (albeit controvertialy). Thesr guys were both pound for pound greats in their own right but giving up size.

    Although he lost to Bob Fitzsimmons he controled much of the fight and probably had Fitz in trouble when the knockdown took place. It was Fitzsimmons ungodly finishing prowess that bailed him out.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    Boxing in 1890's and 1990's were almost different sports, I think it unfair to demean a pioneer, mocking his abilities, in one on one match ups against smaller men.
     
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    I'd be confident saying that Lamotta, Hagler and other MW's had better chins then Fitz.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Actually, it was fitz dirty cheap play that saved him from knockout. Corbett knocked Fitzsimmons down, and fitz GRABBED on to the ref and stalled preventing himself from being counted out. Under modern rules, this is a blatant DQ...this is a controversial victory.
     
  6. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    (I will only give my opinion on the ones i have seen the most.)i would bet my money on corbett any day against all mentioned,this was one of the slickest boxers the ring has ever saw,but he,s also the man that could go toe to toe with the likes of the first ironman of boxing-the very underestimated jim jeffries,and the heavy handed fitz. Lammota,fullmer,toney,and hopkins would all be bad matchups against jim c. I.M.O. especially the first 2 corbett would never go inside and fight when he could dance circles and box there ears off it would be awsome to have a time machine and bring back these old greats ,like the old master of the sweet science
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I could accept LaMotta but Hagler is a bit of a stretch.

    Fitzsimmons was going toe to toe and slugging with guys like Gus Rhulin while Hagler never strayed above middleweight.

    At the most conservative assesment that would be like Hagler slugging it out with sombody like Cobb.