Yeah it looks like a pretty fun app to play around with. I'd like to make some which I can use elsewhere and aren't terribly appropriate for this forum.
Let's see, now. This: http://makeagif.com/i/CDz5MM is Corrie Sanders / Ross Puritty Round 12. As you can see, that bum Sanders who was "knackered in the 5th round" seems to have drunk some magic potion since then and is doing his Ali impression, fairly skipping and jabbing around the ring. I can't understand it, especially since a source as trustworthy and reliable as DINO reported the opposite
Yeah he basically just says whatever he wants hoping someone will take a nibble at it. Makes you wonder if he's ever watch an entire fight from start to finish beyond just 20 seconds of youtube footage.
This dispute isn't about their careers , its about a H2H fantasy match . Ive only seen a handful of Shavers fights , ive seen more of Sanders. But what i have seen of Shavers leads me to believe his best would over come Corrie at his best. As per usual your argument is all based around everything bad about Shavers and everything good about Sanders.
He skipped around the ring for a 4 second spurt and was then back to being flat footed again. You can't use a 4 second gif to illustrate somebody's conditioning over 36 minutes. What a complete flop.
Knowledge of their careers is what we've been using to draw conclusions about the fantasy match and you've made plenty of references yourself - some of which are inaccurate. As per your claim about me focusing on Earnie's shortcomings well I'd say that's the pot calling the kettle black. It's fine to pick shavers to beat Sanders. I've acknowledged myself earlier to someone else that a huge shot from the Acorn could end it at any time. But what you fail to see or admit is that the exact opposite could happen too. And claiming that Earnie clearly had more stamina and staying power isn't a statement that can be well supported.
1) that was 12 seconds 2) I can see when a guy is "knackered" and that isn't it. Your pathology distorts reality for you. 3) You lose again, Dumbovelvet