Corrie Sanders was 37 years old when he destroyed Wlad. Even at 37 a in shape Sanders would destroy Tyson Fury. Not because of how good Sanders was but because how **** poor Tyson Fury is. The guy does nothing but throw slapping arm punches. Of all of the people who held any part of the heavyweight title he has the least amount of over all technique and that includes guys like Charles Martin.
Fury is elite. He's undefeated and anyone who had Wallin winning might as well take up a new sport to give their opinion on. The fight wasn't close oxymoron.
He's as able to put Rahman down before he was stopped. And BC, as you know- there are no excuses in boxing. You are who you are in this sport.
Tyson Fury would school Sanders. The big left wouldn't come close to landing. Not the Sanders straight left. Sanders would have to widen his shots and that's a no no against Fury who is 6'9. Fury has those feints and that jab and when in with a serious opponent, those feints would come in handy against a dangerous opponent and would be more than enoughto damn near shut out Sanders if not stop him late. Sandersw as able to land his Sunday lunch against an inexperienced Wlad. Wlad didn't move his head at all then. I just don't see Sanders winning.
sanders career really was about bizarre coincidences for you. I actually prefer the "sanders wanst motivated for his whole two decade career except when shot and retired , for 90 seconds with Wlad, thats when he fought with his full ability"
Last night was the perfect example. Bad cut and blood going into eye, change of game plan, wade in and take chances and win going away.