Corrie Sanders vs. Jack Dempsey's top opponents 1917-1927

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Jan 19, 2017.


  1. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,449
    1,826
    Sep 9, 2011
    I can see tunney going 1-1, taking the rematch.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,600
    46,234
    Feb 11, 2005
    Perhaps Dempsey should have met Wills and made this conversation more interesting.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  3. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    So what exactly is the purpose of this thread?

    We take fighters that Dempsey fought over a 10 year long span and put them all against one version of Sanders?

    Classy posting, Mendoza.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Ha-ha, right. T-Rex!
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    We always mix and match eras and opponents. Sanders like Dempsey had a lot of hand speed and power. And each man had their times of inactivity, and each man also has a shocking upset loss.

    I do not think Corrie Sanders would go undefeated vs Jack Dempsey's opponents from 1917-1927, but I also think he loses less and draws less.

    Meehan, stopped inside of four rounds

    Futon, a likely loser early, but has a puncher's chance.

    Flynn, KO'd inside of four rounds.

    Willard IMO would be meat. He was only an inactive when Dempsey whacked him.

    Brennan likely stopped inside of 6 rounds.

    Firpo, a likely loser early but one who has a puncher's chance. The man had zero defense and was not the most accurate with his shots.

    Miske, too small even though he could box.

    Carpentier, out early

    Gibbons, a likely loser, I see a UD for Sanders here.

    Sharkey has a chance, but I'd pick Sanders as Jack Sharkey did not have the best chin and was rather inconsistent.

    Tunney might win once, or twice. It would be very interesting.

    Best guess 2 losses for Sanders, maybe 3.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sanders had a leg injury which prevented road work, and conditioning while preparing for the Rahman fight. A reason why he gasses out a little early. Rahman then was at his best, and KO'd Lennox Lewis the next year.

    Regarding Saunders, he was a unique talent. Very fast hands and feet, good athletism. I think he could have achieved greater success if he didn't have a 2rd rate promoter ( Kushner ) and a relatively unknown South African trainer
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,412
    21,842
    Sep 15, 2009
    Vitali is a strange one regards to power as the majority of his stoppages are down to accumulation rather than initial power. Whilst Rahman was heavier, I'm not sure how much of that was muscle and how much was a poor diet.

    If you saw Sanders in his pomp I apologise for the earlier remark.

    It's another point as we, as to how much of a wasted talent he was. Would he have ever beaten Lewis or Vitali, even with training? We'll never know I'll guess but I'm not sure he would ever have bettered his career in his own era.

    Don't get me wrong, individual for individual I do favour Sanders, even over Tunney. But over a career, I just don't see him beating everyone put in front of him.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,704
    80,988
    Aug 21, 2012
    Good posts all round. I enjoyed reading them.

    I definitely agree with Mendoza regarding his promoter. He simply couldn't get the big fights. But quite apart from that, it was a golden time for boxing in America. They should have shipped him over there, stuck his nose in a gym and crammed his schedule like Tyson. He could have been knocking out a bum a month, so long as he did it on TV. Eventually through sheer numbers someone would take notice. Volbrecht was a pretty good trainer, if one did what he said. I have the impression - and this is conjecture - that Volbrecht found it hard to keep Corrie in the gym.

    I believe that he had it in him to produce a performance sufficient to beat Lewis and Vitali, given sufficient motivation and dedication and training. Certainly the raw materials that a great trainer would have had to work with were there - speed, power, accuracy, willingness to take one t give one, punch variety etc - maybe the only attribute that he was missing was a really good chin.

    Then again, I may be succumbing to that tendency that sometimes overwhelms us in Classic, namely the wish to redraw a fighter according to our wishes. Ring rust was a real thing in Sanders' career, and some of his more woeful performance (he still won, but looked poor) were after long peroids of inactivity. I guess that's part of who he was.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  9. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I'm referring to the South African Heavyweight that beat W Klitschko. My bad for any misspellings.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Honestly, getting KO'd by Nate Tubbs is probably what put Sanders' career back in the 1990s.
    Sanders was 23-0 and 28 years old at the time and rated as one of the division's serious up-and-comers. Losing to a guy like Nate Tubbs (a nobody unless you confuse him for his brother) by KO at that stage of your career is going to set you back badly.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am not a fan of making extravagant predictions for fighters who have one big win.

    You always have to wonder if the one big win had more to do with the victim.

    I would never pick James Douglas over another all-time great heavyweight, just because he beat Mike Tyson.

    I view that as Tyson's baggage and nobody else’s.

    Yes Sanders win over Wladamir Klitscko is incredible, but it is his only signature win.

    The rest of his record does not suggest that he would have had a sustained period of consistency, against legitimately world class opposition.
     
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    How do you guys see Sanders reaching Tunney?
    The much lighter, elusive, and quicker Dempsey could hardly touch him.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
    We see this thread from time to time.

    My favourite fighter lost to this bum, so everybody else would lose to him.

    Judge fighters on who they actually let beat them, and who they beat.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,600
    46,234
    Feb 11, 2005
    A prime Sanders was aggressive and fast and brought the fight at range. He was not an old, step slow Dempsey trying to shorten the distance.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Which fight would you recommend to see him in his prime?
    He always seemed like a boxer puncher, not much of a stalker and definitely not a swarmer.

    Also are all these matchups one offs?
    Like is it a prime Sanders in each fight?

    Because I think prime Dempsey beats Tunney.
     
    louis54 likes this.