Because two judges were correct in awarding Wlad every round but the 10-8 in 4. The other judge was an idiot like yourself. It took a minute to find that article via this magical dream machine called da googlez. The commentary I recall was fairly unbiased and made no such speculative claims. Actual Bernstein Quotes, not Dino claims: "The sad thing for (Wlad) is that he didn't have the chance to really answer all the questions people had about him." "A fight he may well get the decision, we expect he might, a fight he didn't get to put his stamp on this." "Not (a night) the Klitschkos are going to be happy about, no matter what." "It left us with an inconclusive feeling about this fight and Wladimir Klitschko, and Davrrll Williamson would say it could have taken away (his) chance for a victory, we'll see, we don't know." So what's this quote, Dino. Enlighten us. He basically ran for his life and got jabbed and sporadically tagged with big punches like the majority of Wlad's opponents. "Just a terrible terrible cut." your friend, Bernstein. The doctor, I know you know more than the doctor, Dino but this was what the doctor said, "It was down to the bone. The cut went to the nerve that controls the pupil" The doctor stopped the fight due to an eye sight threatening injury, it was her call.
He basically danced around in a circle with his gloves up, refusing to engage. Wlad controlled the fight easily with minimal movement and sporadic power punches. You have to pressure Wlad to tire him, Williamson did nothing to take him out of his comfort zone. He was another scared Wlad opponent. Williams had one moment where he caught Wlad off balance but was dominated the rest of the round and hanging on comically like I pointed out with the gif. Haye moved much better than Williamson and was actually looking to counter, if you can't see that, I question your ability to watch a fight objectively.
ydksab. TOS slipped his right hand , made him miss , made him over extend and then countered him with his own right hand which put him over. It was a perfectly legit KD set-up by Williamson. And it was Wlad holding onto him , not the other way around. Your point black refusal to accept any criticism of Wlad is born from pure blind hero-worship. Haye a better mover now? He couldn't position himself to ever throw anything more than a wild over hand swing. Look at the state of him vs Bellew. Thats not because he was old. Ive said that it for years he was an overrated fighter with shocking technical errors in every department. Post like a real person or dont post at all
Al Grey - Aren't you concerned with what you have seen in the ring tonight ? You said this guy is better than Lewis if he could put it together and he certainly isn't showing anything like that Manny
for the first 3 rds sanders would be very dangerous ....but after that its all moorer snapping jab (instead of sanders pawing jab) moorer keeps his hands up nice and high and can go the distance (were sanders slows down )...this is a pick em fight and i wouldnt bet the house on either man ....sanders dangerous early but ill take moorer via 12 rd dec .
The refs warnings to Wlad in round 4 STOP STOP , no no no no , No WRESTLING A few seconds later - NO , you can't grab him like that. A few seconds after that - STOP , you' re grabbing way too strong . BOX A few seconds later again , he takes Wlad to the side - NO NO NO , you can't hold hit and hold and then hit him. Thats not fair Moments later - No no no . you can't turn him around .. And so on, so on... You get the idea. Wlad was the holder
NO. Where is the Al Bernstein quote where "he basically said Wlad was on the way out and was fortunate that the fight went to the cards after 5 rounds." Show or admit you made that claim up.
Berinstien said Wlad never had the fight in lock down and questioned if he would gas out as the rounds went on shortly after it started. After the KD he said Williamson should still hold back and keep doing what he was doing obviously alluding to the fact his strategy for taking Wlad deep was working. Al also said he was no Holmes or even Ellis , just an aged 36 , 4 year amateur -less pro who had been knocked out in one round by Joe Messi. lol.. Admit you made up the claim than King was his promoter. George Durbin was.
Yes, he caught Wlad off balance. His only real moment in the 5 completed round. That's how you would describe this? [url]http://makeagif.com/gif/wladimir-klitschko-vs-davarryl-williamson-02-10-2004-CFeNgR[/url] Age and injuries are not an abstract concept, and fighters don't exist in timeless vacuums.
Sanders would be aware of Moorer's chin and would probably just open up all out in the first round....and something would land on Moorer's chin...then it would turn into a massacre. Sanders KO 1 Moorer. (Sanders was no White Buffalo)
See post #67 For starters I never made up that claim, I directly quoted two separate articles which were in fact correct. You are disputing the claims of those articles and you are in the wrong as usual. Williamson signed with Don King in December 2004. Williams and Byrd were King fighters when their fight was mandated in June 2005 as I always said. [url]http://blog-power.blogspot.com/2004/12/davarryl-williamson-signs-with-don.html[/url]
And so..the Duckman, proven wrong on countless factual points and unable to prove any of his outlandish accusations, reaches his final straw. His final weapon, twisting an instance of bad balance into an admittance of infinite bad balance. What a bizarre line of reasoning that could only exist in the world of boxing forums. Imagine if people used this logic in the real world. For instance. It's like going to the doctor because you got sand in your eye. The doctor asks, "You have sand in your eye?" You reply,"Yes, i have sand in my eye and I can't see" The doctor responds, "So you were always blind. Okay, if you say so. Nothing I can do for you."
Someone needs to start a Sanders vs. Jake LaMottta thread. Both are apparently unbeatable on this forum to many. Figure it would be a draw.